Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation: a meta-analysis and pooled-analysis of acute toxicity.
Wee, Chan Woo; Kang, Hyun-Cheol; Wu, Hong-Gyun; Chie, Eui Kyu; Choi, Noorie; Park, Jong Min; Kim, Jung-In; Huang, Chun-Ming; Wang, Jaw-Yuan; Ng, Shu Y; Goodman, Karyn A.
Afiliação
  • Wee CW; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Kang HC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Wu HG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Chie EK; Cancer Research Institution, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Choi N; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Kim JI; Cancer Research Institution, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Huang CM; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Wang JY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Ng SY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Goodman KA; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 48(5): 458-466, 2018 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554287
BACKGROUND: To compare the acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity profiles between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) using meta-analysis and pooled-analysis from published articles. METHODS: Literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The odd ratios (ORs) were calculated and random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was performed for the pooled-analysis. RESULTS: Six studies including a total of 859 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients (98.7%) received NCRT. In the meta-analysis, IMRT reduced grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis with ORs of 0.38, 0.32 and 0.60, respectively (all P < 0.05), compared to 3DCRT. IMRT also reduced acute grade ≥ 3 proctitis compared to 3D-CRT (OR, 0.24; P = 0.03). No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. In the pooled-analysis, IMRT reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea, proctitis and GU toxicity (all P < 0.05). Moreover, lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis were observed in the patients treated with IMRT (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT significantly reduced acute toxicity in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT compared to 3DCRT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Radioterapia Conformacional / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Radioterapia Conformacional / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article