Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in England and Belgium.
Veer, Vik; Zhang, Henry; Beyers, Jolien; Vanderveken, Olivier; Kotecha, Bhik.
Afiliação
  • Veer V; Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Rd, London, WC1X 8DA, UK.
  • Zhang H; Queens Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford, RM7 0AG, UK.
  • Beyers J; Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, and, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Vanderveken O; Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, and, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Kotecha B; Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Rd, London, WC1X 8DA, UK. bhikkot@aol.com.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 275(5): 1335-1342, 2018 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29556753
PURPOSE: The purpose of this international survey is to ascertain the current practice of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) by Otolaryngologists in the United Kingdom and Belgium. We compare the results with recommendations from the European Position Paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy. METHODS: An online questionnaire was circulated to Consultant Otolaryngologists, independent practitioners, and trainees across the two countries. Eleven questions were used in total. RESULTS: 181 responses from the UK and 117 responses from Belgium were received, mostly from consultants and independent practitioners. SDB was a common presentation to ENT practice, seen by over 90% of clinicians. The use of DISE varied greatly between the two countries (72.9% Belgium, 26.1% UK). 54.1% of Belgian respondents use DISE on over 50% of their patients, compared to only 32.4% of British clinicians. Attitudes of surgeons towards the diagnostic value of DISE varied; in Belgium, the majority (54%) gave a rating of 3 or more (1 = useless to 5 = essential), with no respondents giving a score of 0 (useless). In the UK only 16% of respondents felt DISE had useful clinical value, with 25 respondents deeming it 'useless'. The majority opt for DISE when non-surgical therapies fail (51.4% UK, 61.3% Belgium). The majority of participants do not use objective measures for depth of sedation (75.7% UK, 66.7% Belgium), with a marked variation on anaesthetic methods. 62.2% of UK clinicians do not use a classification system, whereas in Belgium the majority of clinicians (60.8%) use the VOTE grading system. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in Belgium were more favourable to using DISE than in the UK. Differences in its clinical effectiveness were apparent between the two countries. A consensus on patient selection, method of sedation and an effective classification system seemed to be lacking from both countries. Further education is required to raise awareness for the use of DISE.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias / Endoscopia / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias / Endoscopia / Anestesia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article