Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact and cost-effectiveness of formal gastroenterology outpatient referral Clinical Assessment Service.
Pelitari, Stavroula; Hathaway, Charlotte; Gritton, Dean; Smith, Andrea; Bush, David; Menon, Shyam; McKaig, Brian.
Afiliação
  • Pelitari S; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Hathaway C; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Gritton D; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Smith A; Wolverhampton CCG, Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Bush D; Wolverhampton CCG, Wolverhampton Clinical Commissioning Group, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • Menon S; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • McKaig B; Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 9(2): 159-165, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29588847
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to assess the financial and operational impact of our new gastroenterology referral pathway model on our services.

DESIGN:

An electronic 'Clinical Assessment Service' (CAS) proforma and an information platform were developed, and all data were analysed retrospectively.

SETTING:

Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust. PATIENTS 14 245 general practitioner (GP) referrals were received during January 2014-December 2016 with 9773 of them being triaged via our CAS. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

We looked into patients' clinical outcome along with departmental performance and finances.

RESULTS:

A new outpatient appointment was offered to 60.1% (n=5873) of the CAS referred patients. Endoscopic or radiological investigations were requested for 29.2% (n=2854) of patients prior to deciding on further management plan. Out of those, 27% (n=765) went on to receive another gastroenterology (GI) clinic appointment. The remaining 21.3% (n=2089) of the CAS patients were discharged back to their GP following initial investigations. 5.5% (n=538) were discharged back to primary care with a letter of advice, whereas 5.2% (n=509) were deemed inappropriate for GI clinic and were redirected to other specialists. Overall, 32% (n=3127) of patients were managed without a face to face consultation in the GI clinic. This corresponds to 3136 less outpatient appointments with estimated reduced expenditure by the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) of £481K. The 18-week performance and waiting times remained stable despite the increasing referral population. The DNA rate dropped from 14% pre to 8.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our clinical assessment model has, in addition to the clinical benefits, a considerable positive financial impact to the health economy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article