Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation.
Pascual, Julio; Berger, Stefan P; Witzke, Oliver; Tedesco, Helio; Mulgaonkar, Shamkant; Qazi, Yasir; Chadban, Steven; Oppenheimer, Federico; Sommerer, Claudia; Oberbauer, Rainer; Watarai, Yoshihiko; Legendre, Christophe; Citterio, Franco; Henry, Mitchell; Srinivas, Titte R; Luo, Wen-Lin; Marti, AnaMaria; Bernhardt, Peter; Vincenti, Flavio.
Afiliação
  • Pascual J; Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; JPascualSantos@parcdesalutmar.cat.
  • Berger SP; Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Witzke O; Department of Infectious Diseases and Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
  • Tedesco H; Nephrology Division, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mulgaonkar S; Renal and Pancreas Division, St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey.
  • Qazi Y; Division of Nephrology, Keck School of Medicine Renal Transplant Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Chadban S; Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation, Renal Medicine and Transplantation, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Oppenheimer F; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Renal Transplant Unit, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sommerer C; Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Oberbauer R; Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Clinic for Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Watarai Y; Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya-City, Aich, Japan.
  • Legendre C; Department of Kidney Transplantation, Adult Transplantation Service, Paris Descartes University and Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Citterio F; Department of Surgery, Renal Transplantation, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Henry M; Department of Surgery, The Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Srinivas TR; Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.
  • Luo WL; Department of Biometrics and Statistical Science, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey.
  • Marti A; Department of Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; and.
  • Bernhardt P; Department of Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; and.
  • Vincenti F; Department of Surgery, Kidney Transplant Service, University of California, San Francisco, California.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 29(7): 1979-1991, 2018 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29752413
ABSTRACT
Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Inibidores de Calcineurina / Everolimo / Rejeição de Enxerto / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Inibidores de Calcineurina / Everolimo / Rejeição de Enxerto / Imunossupressores Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article