Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PROMs for Pain in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.
Abahussin, Asma A; West, Robert M; Wong, David C; Ziegler, Lucy E.
Afiliação
  • Abahussin AA; Leeds institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
  • West RM; Biomedical Technology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Wong DC; Leeds institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
  • Ziegler LE; Leeds institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
Pain Pract ; 19(1): 93-117, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772118
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Pain is one of the most devastating symptoms for cancer patients. One third of patients who experience pain do not receive effective treatment. A key barrier to effective pain management is lack of routine measurement and monitoring of pain. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended for measuring cancer pain. However, evidence to guide the selection of the most appropriate measure to identify and monitor cancer pain is limited. A systematic review of measurement properties of PROMs for pain in cancer patients is needed to identify the best validated measure for adoption to an electronic platform.

OBJECTIVES:

To systematically review measurement properties of PROMs used for adult cancer patients to measure pain and, as a secondary goal, to investigate the evidence of validated mobile health (mHealth) applications used to measure pain (registration number CRD42017065575).

METHODS:

Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were systematically searched in March 2018 for studies examining measurement properties for PROMs for pain in adult cancer patients. The methodological quality of the studies and their results were appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and specific measurement properties criteria, respectively.

RESULTS:

Sixteen studies evaluating 8 instruments were included. No studies using a PROM in an mHealth application were identified. The methodological quality of the measurement properties ranged between poor and fair. No instrument showed strong positive evidence for all the evaluated measurement properties. Based on the available evidence, the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) had the strongest evidence to support its selection for the measurement of cancer pain.

CONCLUSION:

The BPI-SF was the best performing measure across all properties evaluated through COSMIN. Better quality validation studies of PROMs for cancer pain are needed to explore the full range of measurement properties. Utilizing mHealth applications to measure pain in cancer patients is an innovative approach worthy of further investigation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição da Dor / Dor do Câncer / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medição da Dor / Dor do Câncer / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article