Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Analysis of clinical efficacy of unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament].
Yang, Feng; Tan, Ming-Sheng; Tang, Xiang-Sheng; Jiang, Liang-Hai; Yi, Ping; Hao, Qing-Ying.
Afiliação
  • Yang F; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Tan MS; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China; 13911025605@163.com.
  • Tang XS; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Jiang LH; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Yi P; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
  • Hao QY; China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang ; 31(4): 333-338, 2018 Apr 25.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29772859
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To explore the clinical efficacy of unilateral open-door laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament(OPLL).

METHODS:

The clinical data of 45 patients with OPLL underwent surgical treatment between September 2011 and September 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 26 males and 19 females with a mean age of 53.6 years old(ranged from 28 to 71 years). Among them, 24 cases received the surgery of unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy(combined group), and 21 cases received a single unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty(single group). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications including C5 nerve root palsy and axial symptoms were compared between two groups. Pre-and post-operative Japanese Orthopedic Association(JOA) score, improvement rate of neurological function, Neck Disability Index(NDI) score, and cervical Cobb angle were recorded and analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS:

All the patients were followed up for 12-24 months, with an average of (14.3±2.8) months for combined groups and (13.7±3.1) months for single group, and no significant difference was found between the two groups(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between two groups(P>0.05). Postoperative JOA scores obtained obvious improvement in all patients(P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between two groups for the improvement rate of neurological function(P>0.05). At final follow-up, NDI scores of combined group and single group were 13.6±1.8 and 16.1±2.4 respectively, there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05). The incidence of C5 nerve root palsy was lower in combined group(4.2%) than that of single group (28.6%). There was no significant difference in incidence rate of axial symptoms between two groups(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in cervical Cobb angle between pre-and post-operative conditions, or between two groups(P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy is an effective method to treat cervical OPLL, which could provide sufficient decompression of spinal cord and nerve root, prevent the C5 nerve root palsy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossificação do Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior / Foraminotomia / Laminoplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossificação do Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior / Foraminotomia / Laminoplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article