Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Bingham, Joshua S; Spangehl, Mark J; Hines, Jeremy T; Taunton, Michael J; Schwartz, Adam J.
Afiliação
  • Bingham JS; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Spangehl MJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Hines JT; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Taunton MJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Schwartz AJ; Orthopaedic Department, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(9): 2927-2931, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29853308
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

One potential benefit of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty is the ability to use intraoperative fluoroscopy for acetabular cup positioning and limb-length evaluation. Previous studies comparing the use of fluoroscopy with an anterior approach to a posterior approach have reported conflicting results. To our knowledge, no prior study has compared acetabular cup position and limb-length discrepancy (LLD) using a DAA with and without fluoroscopy.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 298 patients who underwent direct anterior total hip arthroplasty with or without intraoperative fluoroscopy. All procedures were performed by 2 surgeons who use DAA as their primary approach. Preoperative and 6-week postoperative low anteroposterior pelvis and cross-table lateral radiographs were reviewed by 3 independent surgeons. Acetabular cup inclination, anteversion, and LLD were measured and compared.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three patients were excluded for inadequate imaging, leaving 125 patients in the fluoroscopy group and 140 patients in the nonfluoroscopy group. Mean inclination, anteversion, and LLD were 39.4° (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.5°-40.2°), 30.2° (95% CI, 29.2°-31.2°), and 1.1 mm (95% CI, 0.1 mm-2.2 mm) for the fluoroscopy group and 39.9° (95% CI, 39.3°-40.5°), 31.1° (95% CI, 30.0°-32.2°), and 0.8 mm (95% CI, -0.1 mm to 1.6 mm) for the nonfluoroscopy group. There was no significant difference in acetabular inclination (P = .35), anteversion (P = .22), or postoperative LLD (P = .64) between groups.

CONCLUSION:

This study found no clinically or statistically significant difference in acetabular inclination, anteversion, or LLD between the fluoroscopy and nonfluoroscopy groups. Both surgeons achieved a similar mean acetabular cup position and an equivalent mean LLD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoroscopia / Artroplastia de Quadril / Posicionamento do Paciente / Prótese de Quadril / Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluoroscopia / Artroplastia de Quadril / Posicionamento do Paciente / Prótese de Quadril / Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article