Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance Analysis of Ten Common QRS Detectors on Different ECG Application Cases.
Liu, Feifei; Liu, Chengyu; Jiang, Xinge; Zhang, Zhimin; Zhang, Yatao; Li, Jianqing; Wei, Shoushui.
Afiliação
  • Liu F; The State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Remote Measurement and Control, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
  • Liu C; Shandong Zhong Yang Software Limited Company, Jinan, China.
  • Jiang X; The State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Remote Measurement and Control, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
  • Zhang Z; School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Zhang Y; School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Li J; School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Wei S; The State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Jiangsu Key Lab of Remote Measurement and Control, School of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
J Healthc Eng ; 2018: 9050812, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29854370
ABSTRACT
A systematical evaluation work was performed on ten widely used and high-efficient QRS detection algorithms in this study, aiming at verifying their performances and usefulness in different application situations. Four experiments were carried on six internationally recognized databases. Firstly, in the test of high-quality ECG database versus low-quality ECG database, for high signal quality database, all ten QRS detection algorithms had very high detection accuracy (F1 >99%), whereas the F1 results decrease significantly for the poor signal-quality ECG signals (all <80%). Secondly, in the test of normal ECG database versus arrhythmic ECG database, all ten QRS detection algorithms had good F1 results for these two databases (all >95% except RS slope algorithm with 94.24% on normal ECG database and 94.44% on arrhythmia database). Thirdly, for the paced rhythm ECG database, all ten algorithms were immune to the paced beats (>94%) except the RS slope method, which only output a low F1 result of 78.99%. At last, the detection accuracies had obvious decreases when dealing with the dynamic telehealth ECG signals (all <80%) except OKB algorithm with 80.43%. Furthermore, the time costs from analyzing a 10 s ECG segment were given as the quantitative index of the computational complexity. All ten algorithms had high numerical efficiency (all <4 ms) except RS slope (94.07 ms) and sixth power algorithms (8.25 ms). And OKB algorithm had the highest numerical efficiency (1.54 ms).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador / Eletrocardiografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador / Eletrocardiografia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article