Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors at The Population Level: A Comparison of Ambulatory Physician-Coded Claims Data With Clinical Data From A Population-Based Study]. / Untersuchung der Prävalenz kardiologischer Risikofaktoren in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Ein Vergleich ambulanter ärztlicher Abrechnungsdaten mit Daten einer populationsbasierten Studie.
Angelow, Aniela; Reber, Katrin Christiane; Schmidt, Carsten Oliver; Baumeister, Sebastian Edgar; Chenot, Jean-Francois.
Afiliação
  • Angelow A; Abt. Allgemeinmedizin, Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald.
  • Reber KC; Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg.
  • Schmidt CO; Abt. SHIP-KEF, Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald.
  • Baumeister SE; Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie am UNIKA-T, LMU München, Augsburg.
  • Chenot JF; Abt. Allgemeinmedizin, Institut für Community Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald.
Gesundheitswesen ; 81(10): 791-800, 2019 Oct.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29864769
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The study assesses the validity of ICD-10 coded cardiovascular risk factors in claims data using gold-standard measurements from a population-based study for arterial hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking and obesity as a reference.

METHODS:

Data of 1941 participants (46 % male, mean age 58±13 years) of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were linked to electronic medical records from the regional association of statutory health insurance physicians from 2008 to 2012 used for billing purposes. Clinical data from SHIP was used as a gold standard to assess the agreement with claims data for ICD-10 codes I10.- (arterial hypertension), E10.- to E14.- (diabetes mellitus), E78.- (dyslipidemia), F17.- (smoking) and E65.- to E68.- (obesity).

RESULTS:

A higher agreement between ICD-coded and clinical diagnosis was found for diabetes (sensitivity (sens) 84%, specificity (spec) 95%, positive predictive value (ppv) 80%) and hypertension (sens 72%, spec 93%, ppv 97%) and a low level of agreement for smoking (sens 18%, spec 99%, ppv 89%), obesity (sens 22%, spec 99%, ppv 99%) and dyslipidemia (sens 40%, spec 60%, ppv 70%). Depending on the investigated cardiovascular risk factor, medication, documented additional cardiovascular co-morbidities, age, sex and clinical severity were associated with the ICD-coded cardiovascular risk factor.

CONCLUSION:

The quality of ICD-coding in ambulatory care is highly variable for different cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes. Diagnoses were generally undercoded, but those relevant for billing were coded more frequently. Our results can be used to quantify errors in population-based estimates of prevalence based on claims data for the investigated cardiovascular risk factors.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Saúde Pública Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças Cardiovasculares / Saúde Pública Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: De Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article