Insurance Status Biases Trauma-system Utilization and Appropriate Interfacility Transfer: National and Longitudinal Results of Adult, Pediatric, and Older Adult Patients.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the association between insurance status and the probability of emergency department admission versus transfer for patients with major injuries (Injury Severity Score >15) and other complex trauma likely to require higher-level trauma center (TC) care across the spectrum of TC care. BACKGROUND: Trauma systems were developed to facilitate direct transport and transfer of patients with major/complex traumatic injuries to designated TCs. Emerging literature suggests that uninsured patients are more likely to be transferred. METHODS: Nationally weighted Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (2010-2014) and longitudinal California State Inpatient Databases/State Emergency Department Databases (2009-2011) data identified adult (18-64 yr), pediatric (≤17 yr), and older adult (≥65 yr) trauma patients. Risk-adjusted multilevel (mixed-effects) logistic regression determined differences in the relative odds of direct admission versus transfer and outcome measures based on initial level of TC presentation. RESULTS: In all 3 age groups, insured patients were more likely to be admitted [eg, nontrauma center (NTC) private vs uninsured odds ratio (95% confidence interval) adult 1.54 (1.40-1.70), pediatric 1.95(1.45-2.61)]. The trend persisted within levels III and II TCs (eg, level II private vs uninsured adult 1.83 (1.30-2.57)] and among other forms of trauma likely to require transfer. At the state level, among transferred NTC patients, 28.5% (adult), 34.1% (pediatric), and 39.5% (older adult) of patients with major injuries were not transferred to level I/II TCs. An additional 44.3% (adult), 50.9% (pediatric), and 57.6% (older adult) of all NTC patients were never transferred. Directly admitted patients experienced higher morbidity [adult 19.6% vs 8.2%, odds ratio (95% confidence interval)2.74 (2.17-3.46)] and mortality [3.3% vs 1.8%, 1.85 (1.13-3.04)]. CONCLUSIONS: Insured patients with significant injuries initially evaluated at NTCs and level III/II TCs were less likely to be transferred. Such a finding appears to result in less optimal trauma care for better-insured patients and questions the success of transfer-guideline implementation.