Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Finite Element Analysis to Probe the Influence of Acetabular Shell Design, Liner Material, and Subject Parameters on Biomechanical Response in Periprosthetic Bone.
Chatterjee, Subhomoy; Kobylinski, Sabine; Basu, Bikramjit.
Afiliação
  • Chatterjee S; Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; Translational Center on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic and Dental Applications, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India.
  • Kobylinski S; Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; Centre for BioSystems and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; Technical University of Applied Sciences Regensburg (OTH Regensburg), Regensburg 93047, Germany.
  • Basu B; Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; Translational Center on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic and Dental Applications, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India; Centre for BioSystems and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India e-mails: .
J Biomech Eng ; 140(10)2018 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30029239
The implant stability and biomechanical response of periprosthetic bone in acetabulum around total hip joint replacement (THR) devices depend on a host of parameters, including design of articulating materials, gait cycle and subject parameters. In this study, the impact of shell design (conventional, finned, spiked, and combined design) and liner material on the biomechanical response of periprosthetic bone has been analyzed using finite element (FE) method. Two different liner materials: high density polyethylene-20% hydroxyapatite-20% alumina (HDPE-20%HA-20%Al2O3) and highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (HC-UHMWPE) were used. The subject parameters included bone condition and bodyweight. Physiologically relevant load cases of a gait cycle were considered. The deviation of mechanical condition of the periprosthetic bone due to implantation was least for the finned shell design. No significant deviation was observed at the bone region adjacent to the spikes and the fins. This study recommends the use of the finned design, particularly for weaker bone conditions. For stronger bones, the combined design may also be recommended for higher stability. The use of HC-UHMWPE liner was found to be better for convensional shell design. However, similar biomechanical response was captured in our FE analysis for both the liner materials in case of other shell designs. Overall, the study establishes the biomechanical response of periprosthetic bone in the acetabular with preclinically tested liner materials together with new shell design for different subject conditions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho de Prótese / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Fenômenos Mecânicos / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Desenho de Prótese / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Fenômenos Mecânicos / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article