Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment History of Youth At-Risk for Serious Mental Illness.
Farris, Megan S; MacQueen, Glenda; Goldstein, Benjamin I; Wang, JianLi; Kennedy, Sidney H; Bray, Signe; Lebel, Catherine; Addington, Jean.
Afiliação
  • Farris MS; 1 Department of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • MacQueen G; 1 Department of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Goldstein BI; 2 Centre for Youth Bipolar Disorder, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wang J; 3 Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kennedy SH; 4 Work & Mental health Research Unit, Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bray S; 5 Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lebel C; 6 Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Addington J; 7 Department of Psychiatry, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry ; 64(2): 145-154, 2019 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071747
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to describe treatment history including medications, psychosocial therapy and hospital visits of participants in the Canadian Psychiatric Risk and Outcomes Study (PROCAN).

METHODS:

PROCAN is a 2-site study of 243 youth/young adults aged 12 to 25 y, categorized into 4 groups healthy controls ( n = 42), stage 0 (non-help seeking, asymptomatic with risk mainly family history of serious mental illness (SMI); n = 41), stage 1a (distress disorders; n = 52) and stage 1b (attenuated syndromes; n = 108). Participants were interviewed regarding lifetime and current treatments, including medications, psychosocial therapies and hospital visits.

RESULTS:

The number receiving baseline medications differed significantly across groups ( P < 0.001) 0% healthy controls, 14.6% stage 0, 32.7% stage 1a and 34.3% stage 1b. Further, 26.9% and 49.1% of stage 1a and stage 1b participants received psychosocial therapy at baseline, indicative of statistically significant differences among the groups ( P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for lifetime treatment history; stage 1b participants had the highest frequency of lifetime treatment. Medications started in adulthood (>18 y of age) were the most common for initiation of treatment compared to childhood (0 to 12 y) and adolescence (13 to 17 y) for stage 1a and 1b participants. Lifetime mental health hospital visits differed significantly across groups ( P < 0.001) and were most common in stage 1b participants (29.6%) followed by stage 1a (13.5%), stage 0 (4.9%) and healthy controls (2.4%).

CONCLUSION:

We found that treatment history for participants in the PROCAN study differed among the at-risk groups. Future initiatives focused on determining the effects of treatment history on SMI are warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prescrições de Medicamentos / Psicoterapia / Psicotrópicos / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Hospitalização / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prescrições de Medicamentos / Psicoterapia / Psicotrópicos / Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Hospitalização / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article