Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Clinical Practice Patterns of Self-Identified Nuclear Medicine Specialists.
Balthazar, Patricia; Schuster, David M; Grady, Erin E; Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Duszak, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Balthazar P; 1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd, NE, Rm D125A, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Schuster DM; 1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd, NE, Rm D125A, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Grady EE; 1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd, NE, Rm D125A, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Rosenkrantz AB; 2 Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
  • Duszak R; 1 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd, NE, Rm D125A, Atlanta, GA 30322.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 211(5): 978-985, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30085843
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of our study was to study patterns of services rendered by U.S. physicians who self-identify as nuclear medicine (NM) specialists. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Recent Medicare physician claims and demographic files were obtained and linked. NM specialists were defined as physicians self-identifying NM as their primary specialty on claims or as any of their specialties during enrollment. Using other self-identified specialties, we classified physicians as nuclear radiologists, nuclear cardiologists, exclusively NM physicians, or Others. Our primary outcome measure was the percentage of NM effort (in work relative value units [WRVUs]) per physician per specialty group. Secondary outcome measures included physician sociodemographic parameters and most common uniquely rendered services.

RESULTS:

Nationally, 1583 physicians self-identified as NM specialists during the calendar years 2012 through 2015. The distribution of WRVUs attributed to NM varied widely by specialty group; most nuclear radiologists and nuclear cardiologists devoted 10% or less of their effort to NM services whereas most NM physicians devoted 90% or more of their effort to NM services. NM specialists were most commonly nuclear radiologists (52.2%) and men (80.3%) and practiced in urban (98.4%) and nonacademic settings (62.9%). NM physicians interpreted more general NM studies, nuclear radiologists interpreted more cross-sectional imaging studies, and nuclear cardiologists interpreted mostly nuclear cardiology studies, with a majority of their overall work attributed to clinical evaluation and management (E/M). E/M services accounted for less than 2% of WRVUs for both nuclear radiologists and NM physicians.

CONCLUSION:

The work patterns of U.S. NM specialists is highly variable. Most NM physicians practice 90% or more NM, whereas most nuclear radiologists and nuclear cardiologists practice 10% or less NM. Commonly performed services vary considerably by specialty group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Carga de Trabalho / Medicina Nuclear Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Carga de Trabalho / Medicina Nuclear Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article