Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the Oncomine focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples.
Williams, Hannah L; Walsh, Kathy; Diamond, Austin; Oniscu, Anca; Deans, Zandra C.
Afiliação
  • Williams HL; UKNEQAS for Molecular Genetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. hlw37@st-andrews.ac.uk.
  • Walsh K; NHS Lothian, Department of Molecular Pathology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. hlw37@st-andrews.ac.uk.
  • Diamond A; University of St Andrews, School of Medicine, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TF, UK. hlw37@st-andrews.ac.uk.
  • Oniscu A; NHS Lothian, Department of Molecular Pathology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Deans ZC; NHS Lothian, Molecular Genetics, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Virchows Arch ; 473(4): 489-503, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30105577
ABSTRACT
The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation was to assess the performance of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM™) and validate the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels for clinical application in solid tumour testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Using a mixture of routine FFPE and reference material across a variety of tissue and specimen types, we sequenced 86 and 31 samples on the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion assays, respectively. This validation considered a number of parameters including the clinical robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation. The Oncomine™ Focus DNA assay had a sample and variant-based sensitivity of 99.1 and 97.1%, respectively, and an assay specificity of 100%. The Oncomine™ Focus Fusion panel had a good sensitivity and specificity based upon the samples assessed, however requires further validation to confirm findings due to limited sample numbers. We observed a good sequencing performance based upon amplicon, gene (hotspot variants within gene) and sample specific analysis with 92% of clinical samples obtaining an average amplicon coverage above 500X. Detection of some indels was challenging for the routine IonReporter™ workflow; however, the addition of NextGENe® software improved indel identification demonstrating the importance of both bench and bioinformatic validation. With an increasing number of clinically actionable targets requiring a variety of methodologies, NGS provides a cost-effective and time-saving methodology to assess multiple targets across different modalities. We suggest the use of multiple analysis software to ensure identification of clinically applicable variants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Análise de Sequência de RNA / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Análise de Sequência de RNA / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article