Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Switching from Epoetin Alfa (Epogen®) to Epoetin Alfa-Epbx (RetacritTM) Using a Specified Dosing Algorithm: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Study in Adults on Hemodialysis.
Thadhani, Ravi; Guilatco, Ruffy; Hymes, Jeffrey; Maddux, Franklin W; Ahuja, Ajay.
Afiliação
  • Thadhani R; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Guilatco R; Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hymes J; Pfizer Essential Health, Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., Makati City, Philippines.
  • Maddux FW; Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ahuja A; Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Nephrol ; 48(3): 214-224, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30196301
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For patients with anemia undergoing hemodialysis, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are typically dosed via precise algorithms. Using one such algorithm, we assessed the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in patients switched from epoetin alfa reference product (Epogen®) to epoetin alfa-epbx (RetacritTM; a biosimilar to US-licensed Epogen®/Procrit®).

METHODS:

This randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study was conducted at Fresenius Medical Care North America (FMCNA) hemodialysis centers. Patients with anemia and chronic kidney disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and receiving routine intravenous (IV) Epogen® were randomized 1 1 to switch to IV RetacritTM or continue standard-of-care (Epogen®) for 24 weeks, using analogous versions of the FMCNA ESA-dosing algorithm. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time patientshemoglobin was 9-11 g/dL during weeks 17-24.

RESULTS:

Of 432 randomized patients, 418 received treatment (RetacritTM, n = 212; standard-of-care, n = 206) and comprised the full analysis set. A similar proportion of patients discontinued from each arm. The proportion of time patients' hemoglobin was within the target range was 61.9% (95% CI 57.5-66.2) in the RetacritTM arm and 63.3% (95% CI 58.7-67.7) in the standard-of-care arm. The difference in proportions between treatment arms was -1.4% (95% CI -7.6 to 4.9), and the lower bound of the confidence interval was within the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -12.5%. There was no statistically significant difference between arms in the mean change from baseline in the weekly mean ESA dose during weeks 17-24, and no clinically relevant differences in safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Switching to RetacritTM was non-inferior to continuing -Epogen® in maintaining hemoglobin levels in patients receiving hemodialysis, when both ESAs were dosed using a specified algorithm (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504294).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicamentos Biossimilares / Epoetina alfa / Hematínicos / Anemia / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicamentos Biossimilares / Epoetina alfa / Hematínicos / Anemia / Falência Renal Crônica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article