Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of wound healing and postoperative pain after oral mucosa laser biopsy with the aid of compound with chlorhexidine and sodium hyaluronate: a randomized double blind clinical trial.
Palaia, Gaspare; Tenore, Gianluca; Tribolati, Luca; Russo, Claudia; Gaimari, Gianfranco; Del Vecchio, Alessandro; Romeo, Umberto.
Afiliação
  • Palaia G; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy. gaspare.palaia@uniroma1.it.
  • Tenore G; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
  • Tribolati L; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
  • Russo C; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
  • Gaimari G; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
  • Del Vecchio A; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
  • Romeo U; Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via Caserta 6, 00162, Rome, Italy.
Clin Oral Investig ; 23(8): 3141-3151, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30374831
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study is to evaluate secondary intention healing process and postoperative pain of oral soft tissues after laser surgery with the use of a compound containing chlorhexidine and sodium hyaluronate. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This double-blind, randomized clinical study included 56 patients affected by benign oral lesions and subjected to excisional biopsy with diode laser and randomly divided into three groups. Study group (SG) received 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and 0.2% sodium hyaluronate treatment; control group (CG) received 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate; and placebo group (PG) followed the same protocol, taking a neutral solution having the same organoleptic characteristics. Wound healing was evaluated using percentage healing index (PHI). Numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate postoperative pain.

RESULTS:

PHI (T1 = 7 days) was 67.25% for SG, 58.67% for CG, and 54.55% for PG. PHI (T2 = 14 days) was 94.35% for SG, 77.79% for CG, and 78.98% for PG. A statistically significant difference was between the groups for PHI at T2 p = 0.001. No difference was detectable for pain index.

CONCLUSIONS:

A solution containing sodium hyaluronate and chlorhexidine is a good support to increase wound healing by secondary intention after laser biopsy, but no differences were in postoperative perception of pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The use of the tested solution can be recommended after laser oral biopsies, to achieve a healing without suture. About the postoperative pain, the compound has not showed the same results and did not have measurable effects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Clorexidina / Ácido Hialurônico / Mucosa Bucal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Clorexidina / Ácido Hialurônico / Mucosa Bucal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article