[The contraception consultation: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]. / Consultation en contraception. RPC Contraception CNGOF.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Determine the most accurate information to give to women, the most efficient way of doing it, the physical examination during a contraceptive visit and the most appropriate follow-up. METHODS: A systematic review of French-speaking or English-speaking evidence-based literature about contraception and its visit was performed using Pubmed, Cochrane and international recommendations. RESULTS: Showing a contraceptive preference decreases women's satisfaction (EL1) and may decrease contraceptive persistence (EL4). A GATHER's like structured consultation is recommended (Grade A). It allows a contraceptive choice improvement (EL2). Contraceptive knowledge improvement associated with a structured consultation allows a decrease in unplanned pregnancies (EL1) compared to a traditional non-personalized consultation. The main expectations of women are slightly different from what is expected by practitioners (EL2). The main topics to be addressed are efficiency, risks, cost, duration of action and practicality (EL2). The quality of interpersonal communication could allow greater contraceptive persistence (EL2). A careful behavior at the beginning of the consultation and facilitating the expression of the woman's point of view could increase the persistence of the initially prescribed contraception (EL2). Explaining the chosen contraception's adverse effect is recommended because it could allow a better persistence (Grade B). Decision aids has shown interest in the therapeutic choice (EL1). Computerized modules or slide shows in the waiting room before consultation could make the contraceptive choice easier (EL2). The presentation of contraception by effectiveness categories is better than pregnancy numbers for comparing the methods (EL1). Performing a blood pressure measurement prior to an estroprogestative contraception prescription is recommended (Grade C). In women without risk factors, literature data do not allow specific recommendations regarding breast, pelvic examination, laboratory screening and follow-up (Professional agreement).