Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Accuracy of Self-Screening of Group B Streptococcus in Pregnant Women-A Randomized Crossover Study.
Seto, Mimi T Y; Ko, Jennifer K Y; Cheung, Ka Wang; To, Kelvin K W; Hui, Pui Wah; Lao, Terence T; Lee, Chin Peng.
Afiliação
  • Seto MTY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. Electronic address: mimiseto@gmail.com.
  • Ko JKY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Cheung KW; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • To KKW; Department of Microbiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Hui PW; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Lao TT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
  • Lee CP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 41(6): 792-797, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393060
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Universal screening of vaginal and rectal group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnant women is now recommended in many countries to identify at-risk pregnancies and reduce the risk of early-onset GBS disease in newborn infants. This study compared self-screening by pregnant women with screening by health care workers in a largely Chinese population.

METHODS:

A randomized crossover study was conducted in Hong Kong. All women attending the GBS screening visit at 35-37 weeks gestation between May and October 2015 were approached for recruitment. Consenting participants underwent both self-screening and screening by health care workers. Group 1 had health care worker screening swabs first, and group 2 had self-screening first. A positive GBS diagnosis was made if either swab was positive. The sensitivity of each approach was calculated by comparison with this gold standard. Acceptance of GBS self-screening and neonatal outcomes was analyzed (Canadian Task Force Classification I).

RESULTS:

Of the 672 women approached, 428 (63.7%) consented to the study. The prevalence of GBS was 19.7% (83 of 422). Sensitivities of self-screening and screening by health care workers were 61.4% (51 of 83) and 97.6% (81 of 83), respectively (P < 0.05). Women who used vaginal pessaries and non-Chinese women had a higher positive concordance rate with health care workers (P < 0.05). Neonatal outcomes of GBS-positive mothers were similar in the concordant and discordant groups.

CONCLUSION:

The sensitivity of self-screening of GBS in Hong Kong was lower than the sensitivity of screening by health care workers. Cultural difference needs to be considered when implementing self-screening in different populations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Autocuidado / Manejo de Espécimes / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Portador Sadio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Autocuidado / Manejo de Espécimes / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Portador Sadio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article