Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and resting Pd/Pa compared with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a PACIFIC trial sub-study.
de Waard, Guus A; Danad, Ibrahim; Petraco, Ricardo; Driessen, Roel S; Raijmakers, Pieter G; Teunissen, Paul F; van de Ven, Peter M; van Leeuwen, Maarten A H; Nap, Alexander; Harms, Hendrik J; Lammertsma, Adriaan A; Davies, Justin E; Knaapen, Paul; van Royen, Niels.
Afiliação
  • de Waard GA; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Danad I; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Petraco R; National Heart and Lung Institute, 2nd Floor B Block, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, UK.
  • Driessen RS; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Raijmakers PG; Department of Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Teunissen PF; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van de Ven PM; Department of Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Leeuwen MAH; Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Dokter van Heesweg 2, AB Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Nap A; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Harms HJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lammertsma AA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Davies JE; National Heart and Lung Institute, 2nd Floor B Block, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, UK.
  • Knaapen P; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Royen N; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J ; 39(46): 4072-4081, 2018 12 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30452609
Aims: Guidelines recommend the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. For this purpose, physiological lesion assessment without adenosine may have a similar diagnostic accuracy as FFR. We aimed to investigate the performances of FFR, resting instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and resting Pd/Pa compared with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion imaging. Methods and results: [15O]H2O PET and intracoronary pressure measurements were evaluated in 320 coronary arteries (of which 136 coronary stenoses) in 129 stable patients. The primary analysis consisting of the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve for impaired PET hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) <2.3 mL⋅min-1⋅g-1 in coronary stenoses was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.85] for FFR, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.81) for iFR, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.82) for Pd/Pa. No significant differences between area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve were observed for any two indices compared. In a secondary analysis, the diagnostic accuracy compared with impaired PET hyperaemic MBF in coronary stenoses was 72% (95% CI: 64-79%, κ: 0.44) for FFR ≤0.80, 72% (95% CI: 64-80%, κ: 0.44) for iFR ≤0.89, and 70% (95% CI: 62-78%, κ: 0.40) for Pd/Pa ≤0.92. Other secondary analyses included a comparison of physiological indices with PET hyperaemic MBF in all vessels and all of the aforementioned analyses using PET myocardial perfusion reserve as comparator. Statistical testing for the secondary analyses showed results that were consistent with the results of the primary analysis. Conclusion: Fractional flow reserve, iFR, and Pd/Pa showed a similar performance when compared with PET imaging. Our results support the validity of invasive physiological lesion assessment under resting conditions by iFR or Pd/Pa. Trial registration: Sub-study of the PACIFIC trial with clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01521468.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasos Coronários / Estenose Coronária / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Pressão Arterial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasos Coronários / Estenose Coronária / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico / Pressão Arterial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article