Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study.
Kurtz, Florian; Struller, Florian; Horvath, Philipp; Solass, Wiebke; Bösmüller, Hans; Königsrainer, Alfred; Reymond, Marc A.
Afiliação
  • Kurtz F; Dept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Struller F; Dept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Horvath P; Dept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Solass W; Institute of Pathology, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Bösmüller H; Institute of Pathology, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Königsrainer A; Dept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
  • Reymond MA; Dept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Gastroenterol Res Pract ; 2018: 2743985, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30473706
INTRODUCTION: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery system with superior pharmacological properties for treating peritoneal metastasis (PM). Safety and efficacy results of PIPAC with cisplatin/doxorubicin or oxaliplatin from a registry cohort are presented. METHODS: IRB-approved registry study. Retrospective analysis. No predefined inclusion criteria, individual therapeutic recommendation by the interdisciplinary tumor board. Safety assessment with CTCAE 4.0. Histological assessment of tumor response by an independent pathologist using the 4-tied peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS). Mean PRGS and ascites volume were assessed at each PIPAC. RESULTS: A total of 142 PIPAC procedures were scheduled in 71 consecutive patients with PM from gastric (n = 26), colorectal (n = 17), hepatobiliary/pancreatic (n = 9), ovarian (n = 6), appendiceal (n = 5) origin, pseudomyxoma peritonei (n = 4), and other tumors (n = 3). Mean age was 58 ± 13 years. Patients were heavily pretreated. Mean PCI was 19 ± 13. Laparoscopic nonaccess rate was 11/142 procedures (7.7%). Mean number of PIPAC/patient was 2. All patients were eligible for safety analysis. There was no procedure-related mortality. There were 2.8% intraoperative and 4.9% postoperative complications. 39 patients underwent more than one PIPAC and were eligible for efficacy analysis, and PRGS could be assessed in 36 of them. In 24 patients (67%), PRGS improved or remained unchanged at PIPAC#2, reflecting tumor regression or stable disease. Ascites was present in 24 patients and diminished significantly under therapy. Median survival was 11.8 months (95% CI: 7.45-16.2 months) from PIPAC#1. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated and can induce histological regression in a significant proportion of pretreated PM patients. This trial is registered with NCT03210298.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article