Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry.
Han, Seulgi; Shin, Sang Min; Choi, Yong-Seok; Kim, Ki Beom; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro; Maki, Koutaro; Chung, Chooryung J; Kim, Yong-Il.
Afiliação
  • Han S; Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Geumoro20, Mulgeumeup, Yangsan, South Korea.
  • Shin SM; Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea.
  • Choi YS; Department of Statistics, College of Natural Science, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.
  • Kim KB; Department of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
  • Yamaguchi T; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Maki K; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Chung CJ; Department of Orthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim YI; Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Geumoro20, Mulgeumeup, Yangsan, South Korea. kimyongil@pusan.ac.kr.
Oral Radiol ; 35(3): 251-259, 2019 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30484201
OBJECTIVE: To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. METHODS: One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle. RESULTS: Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle (P < 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides (P > 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides (P < 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides (P > 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação Temporomandibular / Assimetria Facial / Cavidade Glenoide Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação Temporomandibular / Assimetria Facial / Cavidade Glenoide Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article