Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What do you expect? Catastrophizing mediates associations between expectancies and pain-facilitatory processes.
Carriere, Junie S; Martel, Marc Olivier; Meints, Samantha M; Cornelius, Marise C; Edwards, Robert R.
Afiliação
  • Carriere JS; Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
  • Martel MO; Faculties of Dentistry and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Meints SM; Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
  • Cornelius MC; Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
  • Edwards RR; Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Pain Management Center, Harvard Medical School, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Eur J Pain ; 23(4): 800-811, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506913
BACKGROUND: Pain expectancies are associated with altered pain sensitivity in individuals with chronic pain. However, little is known about the processes by which pain expectancies impact pain processing. This study assessed the association between pain expectancies and temporal summation (TS) of pain, and examined whether pain catastrophizing mediated this association. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants (437 chronic low back pain [CLBP] patients, 115 controls) completed self-report measures of pain intensity, pain expectancies and pain catastrophizing before undergoing psychophysical pain-testing procedures designed to assess mechanical TS of mechanical pain. Pearson's correlations examined the associations between study variables in CLBP patients and controls. Bootstrapping mediation analyses assessed the mediating role of pain catastrophizing on the association between pain expectancies and TS of pain. RESULTS: Temporal summation of pain was significantly associated with pain expectancies (r = 0.113) and pain catastrophizing (r = 0.171) in CLBP patients. Results of mediation analyses revealed that pain catastrophizing mediated the relationship between pain expectancies and TS of pain in CLBP patients (ab = 0.309, 95% CI = 0.1222-0.5604), but not in healthy controls (ab = -0.125, 95% CI = -0.5864 to 0.0244). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study suggest that compared to controls, CLBP patients show increased sensitivity to mechanical pain procedures and enhanced pain-facilitatory processing, proving further evidence for changes in central nervous system pain processing in CLBP patients. Our results also suggest that pain catastrophizing may be the mechanism by which pain expectancies are associated with TS of pain in CLBP patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with chronic low back pain who expect higher levels of pain and catastrophize about their pain are more likely to experience altered pain sensitivity. Our results point to catastrophizing as a mechanism of action through which psychological factors may operate and lead to the development and maintenance of chronic low back pain.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Catastrofização / Dor Crônica / Somação de Potenciais Pós-Sinápticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Lombar / Catastrofização / Dor Crônica / Somação de Potenciais Pós-Sinápticos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article