Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine-Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers: A Qualitative Study.
Coates, Wendy C; Yarris, Lalena M; Clarke, Samuel O; Runde, Daniel; Kurth, Jacqueline; Fowlkes, Emilie; Jordan, Jaime.
Afiliação
  • Coates WC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: coates@emedharbor.edu.
  • Yarris LM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Clarke SO; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
  • Runde D; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • Kurth J; Department of Emergency Medicine, UCLA-Ronald Reagan/Olive View, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Fowlkes E; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
  • Jordan J; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Emergency Medicine, UCLA-Ronald Reagan/Olive View, Los Angeles, CA.
Ann Emerg Med ; 73(6): 555-564, 2019 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30529113
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Research in basic, translational, and clinical emergency medicine has made great strides since the formalization of emergency medicine as a specialty. Our objective is to identify and analyze strategies used by emergency medicine research pioneers to inform further advancement of research in emergency medicine, particularly for aspiring researchers and those in emerging areas, using emergency medicine medical education as one example. METHODS: This was a prospective, grounded-theory, qualitative study, using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Leading basic science, translational, and clinical emergency medicine researchers who completed residency before 1995 were eligible for structured interviews. Thematic coding followed an iterative process until saturation was reached. A theoretic model was developed and analyzed. RESULTS: Research pioneers valued advanced methodological training and mentorship. Barriers to funding were lack of recognition of emergency medicine as a specialty, absence of a research history, and lack of training and funding resources. Deliberate interventions to improve emergency medicine research included educational sessions at national meetings, external (to emergency medicine) mentor pairings, targeted funding by emergency medicine organizations, and involvement with funding agencies. Pioneers facilitate research excellence by serving as mentors and allocating funds or protected time to develop researchers. To advance emerging subfields of research in emergency medicine, pioneers recommend advanced methodological training that is specific to the area, deliberate mentorship, and the formation of research consortia to conduct generalizable outcomes-based studies. CONCLUSION: Research pioneers in emergency medicine cite mentorship, advanced skills obtained through fellowship or graduate degrees, deliberate collaboration with experienced researchers, support from emergency medicine organizations, and forming networks as the cornerstones of success.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Pesquisa Biomédica / Medicina de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisadores / Pesquisa Biomédica / Medicina de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article