Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Strategies in scheduling marine protected area establishment in a network system.
Kininmonth, Stuart; Weeks, Rebecca; Abesamis, Rene A; Bernardo, Lawrence Patrick C; Beger, Maria; Treml, Eric A; Williamson, David; Pressey, Robert L.
Afiliação
  • Kininmonth S; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket, Sweden.
  • Weeks R; Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Abesamis RA; School of Marine Studies, The University of South Pacific, Suva, Fiji.
  • Bernardo LPC; ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
  • Beger M; ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
  • Treml EA; Silliman University-Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management, Dumaguete City, Philippines.
  • Williamson D; Nadaoka Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Pressey RL; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ecol Appl ; 29(1): e01820, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550634
Instantaneous implementation of systematic conservation plans at regional scales is rare. More typically, planned actions are applied incrementally over periods of years or decades. During protracted implementation, the character of the connected ecological system will change as a function of external anthropogenic pressures, local metapopulation processes, and environmental fluctuations. For heavily exploited systems, habitat quality will deteriorate as the plan is implemented, potentially influencing the schedule of protected area implementation necessary to achieve conservation objectives. Understanding the best strategy to adopt for applying management within a connected environment is desirable, especially given limited conservation resources. Here, we model the sequential application of no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) in the central Philippines within a metapopulation framework, using a range of network-based decision rules. The model was based on selecting 33 sites for protection from 101 possible sites over a 35-yr period. The graph-theoretic network criteria to select sites for protection included PageRank, maximum degree, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, minimum degree, random, and historical events. We also included a dynamic strategy called colonization-extinction rate that was updated every year based on the changing capacity of each site to produce and absorb larvae. Each rule was evaluated in the context of achieving the maximum metapopulation mean lifetime at the conclusion of the implementation phase. MPAs were designated through the alteration of the extinction risk parameter. The highest ranked criteria were PageRank while the actual implementation from historical records ranked lowest. Our results indicate that protecting the sites ranked highest with regard to larval supply is likely to yield the highest benefit for fish abundance and fish metapopulation persistence. Model results highlighted the benefits of including network processes in conservation planning.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ecossistema / Conservação dos Recursos Naturais Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article