Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Completion Lymph Node Dissection or Radiation Therapy for Sentinel Node Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
Lee, Jay S; Durham, Alison B; Bichakjian, Christopher K; Harms, Paul W; Hayman, James A; McLean, Scott A; Harms, Kelly L; Burns, William R.
Afiliação
  • Lee JS; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5932, USA.
  • Durham AB; Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Bichakjian CK; Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Harms PW; Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Hayman JA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • McLean SA; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Harms KL; Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Burns WR; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5932, USA. wilburns@med.umich.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(2): 386-394, 2019 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556118
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the benefit of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) versus radiation therapy (RT) is unclear. This study compares outcomes for patients with SLN metastasis undergoing CLND or RT. We also evaluated positive non-SLNs as a prognostic factor.

METHODS:

Using a prospective database, we identified MCC patients with SLN metastasis who underwent CLND or RT. At our institution, CLND was recommended for patients with acceptable perioperative risk, while therapeutic RT was offered to those with high perioperative risk. Primary outcomes were MCC-specific survival (MCCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS).

RESULTS:

From 2006 to 2017, 163 patients underwent CLND (n = 137) or RT (n = 26). Median follow-up was 1.9 years. CLND had no significant differences for MCCSS (5-year survival 71% vs. 64%, p = 1.0), DFS (52% vs. 61%, p = 0.8), NRFS (76% vs. 91%, p = 0.3), or DRFS (65% vs. 75%, p = 0.3) compared with RT. Patients with positive non-SLNs (n = 44) had significantly worse MCCSS (5-year survival 39% vs. 87%, p < 0.001), DFS (35% vs. 60%, p = 0.005), and DRFS (54% vs. 71%, p = 0.03) compared with negative non-SLNs (n = 93). Multivariate analysis showed positive non-SLNs were independently associated with MCCSS, DFS, and DRFS.

CONCLUSIONS:

CLND and RT may have similar outcomes for MCC patients with SLN metastasis when treatment aligns with our institutional practices. For patients undergoing CLND, positive non-SLNs is an important prognostic factor associated with poor survival and distant recurrence. This high-risk group should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy trials.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel / Linfonodo Sentinela / Excisão de Linfonodo / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel / Linfonodo Sentinela / Excisão de Linfonodo / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article