Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diabetic foot ulcer treatment with focused shockwave therapy: two multicentre, prospective, controlled, double-blinded, randomised phase III clinical trials.
Snyder, Robert; Galiano, Robert; Mayer, Perry; Rogers, Lee C; Alvarez, Oscar.
Afiliação
  • Snyder R; Barry University, Miami Shores, FL, US.
  • Galiano R; Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US.
  • Mayer P; The Mayer Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rogers LC; Medical Director of Amputation Prevention Centers of America.
  • Alvarez O; Calvary Hospital, Bronx, NY, US.
J Wound Care ; 27(12): 822-836, 2018 12 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557108
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the efficacy of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) as an adjunctive treatment for neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) (1A or 2A on the University of Texas grading scheme), compared with sham treatment.

METHOD:

We performed two multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blinded, phase III clinical trials using focused ESWT compared with sham examining DFUs that did not reduce in volume by ≥50% over 2 weeks' standard treatment immediately prior to randomisation. Patients were enrolled into the trials and randomised for either standard care and focused ESWT (pulsed acoustic cellular expression. dermaPACE System, SANUWAVE Health Inc.) active therapy, or standard care and sham therapy. Both active and sham therapy were administered four times in 2 weeks in study 1 and a maximum of eight times over 12 weeks in study 2. Standard care continued in both studies throughout the 12-week treatment phase. The proportion of DFUs that closed completely by 12, 20 and 24 weeks was measured.

RESULTS:

The two studies evaluated 336 patients; 172 patients treated with active therapy and 164 managed with a sham device. The demographic characteristics of patients in the two arms of both studies were balanced and statistical comparison of the two studies justified pooling datasets for analysis. Statistically significantly more DFU healed at 20 (35.5% versus 24.4%; p=0.027) and 24 weeks (37.8% versus 26.2%; p=0.023) in the active treatment arm compared with the sham-controlled arm. At 12 weeks the active therapy arm trended to significance (22.7% versus 18.3%).

CONCLUSION:

The outcome of these two trials suggests that ESWT is an effective therapeutic modality in combination with standard care for neuropathic DFU that do not respond to standard care alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Pé Diabético / Ondas de Choque de Alta Energia / Neuropatias Diabéticas / Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatrização / Pé Diabético / Ondas de Choque de Alta Energia / Neuropatias Diabéticas / Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article