Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of oral mucosal disorders during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bett, João Victor Silva; Batistella, Elis Ângela; Melo, Gilberto; Munhoz, Etiene de Andrade; Silva, Carolina Amália Barcellos; Guerra, Eliete Neves da Silva; Porporatti, André Luís; De Luca Canto, Graziela.
Afiliação
  • Bett JVS; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Batistella EÂ; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Melo G; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Munhoz EA; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Silva CAB; Department of Morphological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • Guerra ENDS; Laboratory of Oral Histopatology, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasília (UNB), Brasília, Brazil.
  • Porporatti AL; Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
  • De Luca Canto G; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
J Oral Pathol Med ; 48(4): 270-277, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673134
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the prevalence of oral mucosal disorders during pregnancy.

METHODS:

Observational studies were selected by two reviewers in a two-phase process. Search strategies were applied at CINAHL, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Synthesis of results was calculated by the software R Statistics version 3.5.1 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Confidence in cumulative evidence was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

RESULTS:

Fifteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were selected for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, of which 5935 participants were enrolled. The overall prevalence of oral mucosal disorders was 11.8%. Gingival hyperplasia (17.1%), morsicatio buccarum (10%), oral candidiasis (4.4%), pyogenic granuloma (3%), and benign migratory glossitis (2.8%) were the most prevalent lesions. The overall risk of bias was considered moderate, and the quality of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION:

Disorders of the oral mucosa were present in approximately 1 out of 10 pregnant women. Gingival hyperplasia was the most prevalent lesion. Further studies should apply homogeneous methodology to improve the quality of evidence.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Doenças da Boca / Mucosa Bucal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações na Gravidez / Doenças da Boca / Mucosa Bucal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article