Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a Focal Simultaneous Integrated Boost: Acute Toxicity and Dosimetry Results From a Prospective Trial.
McDonald, Andrew M; Dobelbower, Michael C; Yang, Eddy S; Clark, Grant M; Jacob, Rojymon; Kim, Robert Y; Cardan, Rex A; Popple, Richard; Nix, Jeffrey W; Rais-Bahrami, Soroush; Fiveash, John B.
Afiliação
  • McDonald AM; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Dobelbower MC; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Yang ES; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Clark GM; East Tennessee Radiation Oncology PC, Knoxville, Tennessee.
  • Jacob R; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Kim RY; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Cardan RA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Popple R; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Nix JW; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Urology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Rais-Bahrami S; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Urology, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Fiveash JB; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiation Oncology, Birmingham, Alabama.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 4(1): 90-95, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30706015
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to report the early toxicity results of a prospective clinical trial of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the entire prostate with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined focal lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients included men with biopsy-proven prostate stage T1c to T2c adenocarcinoma, a Gleason score ≤7, and prostate-specific antigen values of ≤20 ng/mL, who had at least 1 focal lesion visible on MRI and a total prostate volume no greater than 120 cm3. SBRT consisted of a dose of 36.25 Gy to the entire prostate with an SIB of 40 Gy to the MRI-defined lesions, delivered in 5 fractions. The primary purpose of the study was to confirm the feasibility of treatment planning/delivery and to estimate the rate of urinary retention requiring placement of a Foley catheter within 90 days of treatment. This study was to be considered successful if urinary retention occurred in no more than 15% of cases, with a planned enrollment of at least 25 patients.

RESULTS:

A total of 26 men were enrolled, and all underwent SBRT as planned. Twenty patients (77%) had intermediate-risk features, and the remainder were low risk. A treatment plan that met the protocol-defined goals for all cases was developed. Two patients (7.7%) developed acute urinary symptoms that required the temporary placement of a Foley catheter. No grade 3+ toxicity events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Planning and delivery of prostate SBRT with a whole prostate dose of 36.25 Gy and a focal 40 Gy SIB is feasible. Early follow-up suggests that this treatment is not associated with undue morbidity.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article