Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Robotic Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: Head-to-head Comparison From a Single-Institutional Prospective Study.
Bertolo, Riccardo; Agudelo, Jose; Garisto, Juan; Armanyous, Sherif; Fergany, Amr; Kaouk, Jihad.
Afiliação
  • Bertolo R; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Agudelo J; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Garisto J; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Armanyous S; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Fergany A; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Kaouk J; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: kaoukj@ccf.org.
Urology ; 129: 98-105, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30707964
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of intracorporeal (ICUD) vs extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).

METHODS:

From January 2014 to December 2017, data of consecutive patients who underwent RARC performed by 2 institutional surgeons were prospectively collected in a dedicated database (IRB 251647). Patients were divided in 2 groups according to the operating surgeon, one performing ECUD, the other ICUD. Groups were compared in perioperative outcomes and Clavien complications (during admission, within 30- and 90-days postoperatively). Univariable and multivariable analyses tested the impact of variables of interest on the occurrence of complications at the different time points. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence and metastasis-free survivals.

RESULTS:

Sixty to 66 patients underwent RARC with ileal conduit ICUD and ECUD, respectively. ICUD patients were younger (69 vs 73 years old, P = .009). No differences were found in other baseline characteristics and final pathology. Regarding perioperative outcomes, shorter operative time favored ECUD (7 vs 6 hours, P = .0004). Specifically, no differences were found in postoperative complications while admitted, either overall (ICUD 16 [26.7%] vs ECUD 23 [34.8%] patients, P = .3) or major (ICUD 10 [16.7%] vs ECUD 14 [21.2%], P = .6); same was for reassessment within 30- and 90-days postoperatively. At multivariable analysis, Charlson's Comorbidity Index ≥3 and blood losses >600 mL predicted complications during the admission (P = .02). Male gender, higher body mass index, and ureteral involvement predicted 30-days complications (P = .04). No differences in oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

At head-to-head comparison of 2 expert surgeons, ICUD and ECUD for ileal conduit had comparable perioperative outcomes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Derivação Urinária / Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Cistectomia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Derivação Urinária / Bexiga Urinária / Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária / Cistectomia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article