Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Treating Prostate Volumes of ≤80 and > 80 mL.
Gazel, Eymen; Kaya, Engin; Yalcin, Serdar; Aybal, Halil Çagri; Aydogan, Tahsin Batuhan; Tunc, Lutfi.
Afiliação
  • Gazel E; Department of Urology, Acibadem University Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kaya E; Department of Urology, Health Science University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, drenginkaya@yahoo.com.
  • Yalcin S; Department of Urology, Health Science University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Aybal HÇ; Department of Urology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Aydogan TB; Department of Urology, Kahramanmaras Goksun State Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
  • Tunc L; Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Urol Int ; 102(3): 306-310, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30731471
INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is becoming the new standard procedure for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a common condition in aging men. Most studies have focused on proving its efficacy in treating large prostates. In this study, we compared its efficacy in treating small (< 80 mL) and large (> 80 mL) prostates. METHODS: This prospective study included 119 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP by the same surgeon between June 2015 and December 2017. They were divided into 2 groups according to their prostate volumes (≤80 mL: Group 1; > 80 mL: Group 2). Various pre- and postoperative parameters were compared within and between the groups. RESULTS: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), postvoid residual (PVR) volume, and voiding time (VT) significantly decreased, and the peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), average urinary flow rate (Qave), and quality of life (QoL) score significantly increased postoperatively in both groups. The postoperative changes in IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, Qave, VT, PVR volume, and hemoglobin levels were not significantly different between the groups. In addition, no significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that HoLEP is an effective procedure for treating both small and large prostates.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Terapia a Laser / Lasers de Estado Sólido Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article