Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy.
Procter, Alexander J; Sun, Julia Y; Malcolm, Paul N; Toms, Andoni P.
Afiliação
  • Procter AJ; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK. ajprocterac@gmail.com.
  • Sun JY; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
  • Malcolm PN; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
  • Toms AP; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Ln, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
BMC Med Imaging ; 19(1): 14, 2019 02 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736759
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The assessment of liver percentage fat fraction (%FF) using proton density fat fraction sequences is becoming increasingly accessible. Previous studies have tended to use multiple small ROIs that focus on Couinaud segments. In an effort to simplify day-to-day analysis, this study assesses the impact of using larger, elliptical ROIs focused on a single hepatic lobe. Additionally, we assess the impact of sampling fewer transhepatic slices when measuring %FF.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained images from 34 volunteers using an IDEAL IQ sequence. Two observers independently measured %FF using three different protocols freehand whole-liver ROI (fh-ROI), elliptical-ROI on the right lobe (rt-ROI) and elliptical-ROI on the left lobe (lt-ROI).

RESULTS:

Inter-observer reliability for all measurements techniques was 'excellent' (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients 0.81-0.98). There was a significant difference (Paired Wilcoxon Test p < 0.001) between the median %FF obtained using fh-ROI when compared to the rt-ROI method, the maximum mean difference between the two techniques was 2.79% (95% CI). For all sampling methods a Kruskall-Wallis analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean %FF when the number of slices sampled was reduced from 11 to 1. The mean coefficient of variance increased when more slices were sampled (3 slices = 0.1, 11 slices = 0.17, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Simplified ROIs focused on one hepatic lobe provide %FF measurements that are unlikely to be sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice. Freehand whole-liver ROIs should be used in preference. A single freehand ROI measurement taken at the level of the hepatic hilum yields a %FF that is representative of the mean whole liver % FF. Multiple slices are needed to measure heterogeneity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tecido Adiposo / Fígado Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Tecido Adiposo / Fígado Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article