Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a Plain Language Decision Support Tool for Cancer Clinical Trials: Blending Health Literacy, Academic Research, and Minority Patient Perspectives.
Langford, Aisha T; Hawley, Sarah T; Stableford, Sue; Studts, Jamie L; Byrne, Margaret M.
Afiliação
  • Langford AT; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, Room 645, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Aisha.Langford@nyumc.org.
  • Hawley ST; Ann Arbor VA Center of Excellence in Health Services Research & Development, University of Michigan Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management & Policy, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC Building 16, 4th Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Stableford S; Health Literacy, Plain Language, & Clear Health Communication Consultant, Brunswick, ME, USA.
  • Studts JL; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 127 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0086, USA.
  • Byrne MM; Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 4117 E Fowler St., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
J Cancer Educ ; 35(3): 454-461, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739270
ABSTRACT
Despite the promise of clinical trials for improving cancer care, less than 5% of all cancer patients participate. Racial/ethnic minorities continue to be underrepresented in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). To address this gap, we developed a plain language, web-based decision support tool (CHOICES DST) in English and Spanish to support decision-making about CCTs among Blacks and Hispanics. In phase 1 (information collection), we conducted qualitative interviews with 45 cancer patients, completed a thorough literature review, and reviewed results from a telephone survey of 1100 cancer patients. In phase 2 (content generation), we created the first iteration of the CHOICES DST. In phase 3 (usability testing), we gathered user experience and acceptability data from a small sample of cancer survivors (n = 9). The Knowledge, Empowerment, and Values Clarification (KEV) model of decision-making was developed based on data from phase 1. The KEV model and other phase 1 data allowed us to create the CHOICES DST platform. Usability testing of the CHOICES DST showed highly favorable responses from users, satisfaction with content, ease of navigation, and a desire to use the tool. Qualitative results identified addressable points that would benefit from content and navigation-related alterations. The final version of the CHOICES DST was well received and understood by Black and Hispanic participants, and adheres to the mandates for plain language communication. This research provides preliminary data that CHOICES DST holds promise for improving knowledge of CCTs and potentially improving informed decision-making about participation in trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Comunicação / Tomada de Decisões / Letramento em Saúde / Idioma / Grupos Minoritários / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Comunicação / Tomada de Decisões / Letramento em Saúde / Idioma / Grupos Minoritários / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article