Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Visual Attention Patterns Differ by Pictorial Health Warning Label Features.
Mercincavage, Melissa; Burdge, Jordan; Lochbuehler, Kirsten; Souprountchouk, Valentina; McCullough, Alexandra A; Strasser, Andrew A.
Afiliação
  • Mercincavage M; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction [CIRNA], University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Burdge J; Department of Psychiatry, CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Lochbuehler K; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science and CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Souprountchouk V; Department of Psychiatry, CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • McCullough AA; Department of Psychiatry, CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Strasser AA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science and CIRNA, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Tob Regul Sci ; 4(6): 8-17, 2018 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30775412
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In this study, we sought to determine how smokers allocate their attention when viewing the 9 cigarette pictorial warning labels (PWLs) proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and identify PWL attributes associated with increased attention.

METHODS:

Using eye-tracking data from an exploratory within-subject study, we examined smokers' attention (latency, latency duration, and dwell time) to areas of interest (image vs textual warning) for each PWL among 95 daily, non-treatment-seeking smokers (62.1% male, 48.4% white, mean [SD] age = 32.98 [10.14], mean [SD] cigarettes/day = 15.51 [8.43]). We also compared attention measures by PWL message congruency, textual warning location, and participant rankings of effectiveness.

RESULTS:

Attention measures differed significantly among PWLs (p s < .001) and by features and self-reported effectiveness rankings (p s < .001 - .039). Congruent PWLs, those displaying text across the warning label, and those ranked most effective were associated with sustained attention to image, whereas incongruent PWLs, those displaying left text, and those ranked least effective, were associated with faster and sustained attention to text.

CONCLUSIONS:

Smokers allocated their attention differently across PWLs. Formats and participant effectiveness rankings of PWLs were associated with visual attention patterns, suggesting the importance of these features to the design of potential future PWLs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article