Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification and Assessment of Drug-User Groups Among Nightlife Attendees: Self-Reports, Breathalyzer-Tests and Oral Fluid Drug Tests.
Bretteville-Jensen, Anne Line; Burdzovic Andreas, Jasmina; Gjersing, Linn; Øiestad, Elisabeth Leere; Gjerde, Hallvard.
Afiliação
  • Bretteville-Jensen AL; Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway, albr@fhi.no.
  • Burdzovic Andreas J; Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Gjersing L; Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Øiestad EL; Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Gjerde H; School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eur Addict Res ; 25(2): 93-102, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30783038
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Even though nightlife studies with potentially intoxicated participants provide the much needed information on drug use, they face additional methodological challenges. This study aimed to explore the utility of such studies by (i) classifying nightlife attendees based on their self-reported drug use and by (ii) examining whether these classifications were meaningful when assessed against other sources of data, including oral fluid drug tests.

METHODS:

Self-reported questionnaires, oral fluid samples and blood alcohol concentration readings were collected in a sample of 1,085 nightlife patrons recruited outside 12 popular nightclubs in Oslo, Norway, in 2014. Patrons were classified using multiple approaches, including latent class analysis. Group differences were examined by logistic regression models.

RESULTS:

Participants were classified into 5 mutually exclusive groups 2 among current non-users ("Never-users"; "Previous users"), 2 among current users ("Multiple drugs"; "Cannabis mainly") and one "Incomplete information" group. Meaningful differences across these groups were observed. For instance, positive tests for any illicit drug were more common in "Multiple drugs" group than in "Cannabis mainly" (62.7 vs. 29.1%, adjusted OR [aOR] 3.77 [2.42-5.84]) or "Incomplete information" groups (62.7 vs. 34.4%, aOR 2.46 [1.26-4.79]). Despite their self-declared non-use, illicit substances were detected in oral fluids of "Never-users" (13.1%; 95% CI 9.9-17.2) and "Previous users" (7.9%; 95% CI 5.1-12.1).

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite some discrepancies between self-reports and biological tests, self-reports proved both suitable and useful in identification of substantively different drug-user typologies, potentially informing targeted policy responses. Still, methodological challenges associated with onsite studies of illicit drug use should be further explored.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saliva / Testes Respiratórios / Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas / Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias / Usuários de Drogas / Autorrelato / Atividades de Lazer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saliva / Testes Respiratórios / Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas / Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias / Usuários de Drogas / Autorrelato / Atividades de Lazer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article