The effect of combining coronary bypass with carotid endarterectomy in patients with unrevascularized severe coronary disease.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Management of significant carotid stenosis in those with symptomatic coronary disease remains controversial. Staged and combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with coronary artery bypass grafting has been described. Yet, an understanding of the additive risks of these approaches is poor. This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with clinically relevant coronary disease undergoing either isolated CEA (ICEA) or combined CEA and coronary artery bypass (concurrent coronary artery bypass [CCAB]). METHODS: All CEAs in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2017 were reviewed. CCABs were identified, as were ICEAs in patients with unrevascularized stable angina, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction (MI) within 6 months of operation. CCABs were compared with ICEAs as well as with a risk-matched cohort of ICEAs. Primary outcomes included perioperative stroke, all-cause death, MI, and these as composite (SDM). Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: There were 4042 patients identified, including 2582 ICEA patients (64%) and 1460 CCAB patients (36%); 61% were male, 91% were white, and 39% had symptomatic carotid disease. Overall stroke was 3.5%, death 1.8%, and SDM 6.0%. ICEA had higher rates of postoperative MI (1.9% vs 0.9%; P = .01) but lower rates of stroke (2.8% vs 4.7%; P = .002), death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P < .001), and SDM (5.1% vs 7.5%; P = .002). After regression, predictors of SDM were congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.4; P < .001), urgent operation (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = .001), and CCAB (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.7; P = .04). After propensity matching, ICEA continued to have higher rates of perioperative MI (2.6% vs 1.0%; P = .01) and lower rates of death (1.0% vs 3.0%; P = .001). However, there were no longer differences in stroke (3.2% vs 4.6%; P = .10) or SDM (6.3% vs 7.8%; P = .18). Within the matched cohort, predictors of SDM included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2; P = .01), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5; P = .01), and symptomatic carotid disease (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.03-2.1; P = .03). CCAB was not significant (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.8; P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unrevascularized, clinically relevant coronary disease, CCAB reduces operative MI but increases risk of stroke and death. After risk adjustment, MI remains higher in ICEA, but differences in 30-day stroke and SDM between ICEA and CCAB are no longer appreciated. These data suggest that CEA risk undertaken in patients with unrevascularized coronary disease is not inconsequential, and outcomes are similar to those of CCAB.