Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of reciprocating systems for removing root filling material plus complementary cleaning methods in flattened canals: Microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study.
Borges, Mariana M B; Duque, Jussaro A; Zancan, Rafaela F; Vivan, Rodrigo R; Bernardes, Ricardo A; Duarte, Marco A H.
Afiliação
  • Borges MMB; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Duque JA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Zancan RF; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Vivan RR; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Bernardes RA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Duarte MAH; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Microsc Res Tech ; 82(7): 1057-1064, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30889319
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate three reciprocating systems and complementary cleaning methods on filling material removal during retreatment of flattened canals. Thirty-six mandibular incisors were prepared using rotary instruments up to size 25.08 and filled using the single-cone technique. Subsequently, the teeth were divided into three groups (n = 12) according to retreatment procedures Reciproc Blue (RB) 25/0.08 and 40/0.06; ProDesign R (PDR) 25/0.06 and 35/0.05; and WaveOne Gold (WOG) 25/0.07 and 35/0.06. The remaining filling volume materials were assessed by means of micro-CT imaging before and after retreatment. After this, the specimens were subdivided into three groups according to complementary cleaning

methods:

XP-Endo Shaper (30/0.01); passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); 60° oscillatory instrumentation with #30 H-file, and micro-CT scan was taken. Then, the roots were cut in half and the samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data were analyzed statistically using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's Multiple Comparison test with significance level of 5%. None of the reciprocating files promoted complete removal of filling material and there was no statistical difference between the groups, regardless instrument size (p > 0.05). Complementary cleaning methods increased remnant filling removal (p < 0.05). XP-endo Shaper significantly reduced the amount of filling material in the apical and middle thirds, compared with H-files (p < 0.05), with no difference with PUI. In the SEM, there was no statistical difference among the instruments (p > 0.05). The reciprocating systems showed similar effectiveness in removing root filling material. Complementary cleaning method with the XP-Shaper enhanced filling material removal.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Cavidade Pulpar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Materiais Restauradores do Canal Radicular / Obturação do Canal Radicular / Preparo de Canal Radicular / Cavidade Pulpar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article