Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry: A Concordance Study Between Surgical Specimen, Biopsy, and Tissue Microarray.
Elfving, Hedvig; Mattsson, Johanna Sofia Margareta; Lindskog, Cecilia; Backman, Max; Menzel, Uwe; Micke, Patrick.
Afiliação
  • Elfving H; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Mattsson JSM; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lindskog C; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Backman M; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Menzel U; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Micke P; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: patrick.micke@igp.uu.se.
Clin Lung Cancer ; 20(4): 258-262.e1, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30926355
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The immunohistochemical analysis of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor tissue of non-small-cell lung cancer patients has now been integrated in the diagnostic workup. Analysis is commonly done on small tissue biopsy samples representing a minimal fraction of the whole tumor. The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation of PD-L1 expression on biopsy specimens with corresponding resection specimens. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In total, 58 consecutive cases with preoperative biopsy and resected tumor specimens were selected. From each resection specimen 2 tumor cores were compiled into a tissue microarray (TMA). Immunohistochemical staining with the antibody SP263 was performed on biopsy specimens, resection specimens (whole sections), as well as on the TMA.

RESULTS:

The proportion of PD-L1-positive stainings were comparable between the resection specimens (48% and 19%), the biopsies (43% and 17%), and the TMAs (47% and 14%), using cutoffs of 1% and 50%, respectively (P > .39 all comparisons). When the resection specimens were considered as reference, PD-L1 status differed in 16%/5% for biopsies and in 9%/9% for TMAs (1%/50% cutoff). The sensitivity of the biopsy analysis was 79%/82% and the specificity was 90%/98% at the 1%/50% cutoff. The Cohens κ value for the agreement between biopsy and tumor. was 0.70 at the 1% cutoff and 0.83 at the 50% cutoff.

CONCLUSION:

The results indicate a moderate concordance between the analysis of biopsy and whole tumor tissue, resulting in misclassification of samples in particular when the lower 1% cutoff was used. Clinicians should be aware of this uncertainty when interpreting PD-L1 reports for treatment decisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biópsia / Imuno-Histoquímica / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Análise Serial de Tecidos / Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biópsia / Imuno-Histoquímica / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas / Análise Serial de Tecidos / Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article