Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validity of the +1.50 plus lens screening test as a predictor of uncorrected moderate hyperopia.
Hopkins, Shelley; Black, Alex A; White, Sonia L; Wood, Joanne M.
Afiliação
  • Hopkins S; School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Black AA; School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • White SL; School of Early Childhood and Inclusive Education, Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Wood JM; School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 39(3): 141-147, 2019 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994200
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Screening for uncorrected hyperopia in school children is important given its association with poorer visual function and academic performance. However, standard distance visual acuity screening may not detect low to moderate hyperopia. The plus lens test is used to screen for hyperopia in many school screening protocols, but has not been well validated. The current study investigated the effectiveness of the plus lens test to identify hyperopia in school children.

METHODS:

Participants included Grade 2 school children. Monocular distance visual acuity (logMAR letter chart) was measured unaided, and then through a +1.50D lens, known as the plus lens test. Cycloplegic refraction was undertaken to classify moderate hyperopia (≥+2.00D). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for commonly used cut-offs for the plus lens test 6/6, 6/9 and less than two lines difference between unaided acuity and acuity through the plus lens test.

RESULTS:

The sample included 59 children (mean age 7.2 ± 0.4 years). Fourteen (24%) children were classified as having uncorrected hyperopia. The sensitivity and specificity of the +1.50 plus lens test for identifying hyperopia were 0% and 98% respectively for a 6/6 cut-off, 29% and 91% for 6/9 cut-off, and 50% and 76% for a <2 line reduction between unaided acuity and acuity through the plus lens test. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis revealed area under curves of 0.69 based on acuity through the plus lens test, and 0.65 for a reduction in acuity through the plus lens test.

CONCLUSIONS:

The plus lens test has low sensitivity for detecting uncorrected hyperopia using traditional cut-offs of 6/9 or better. This raises questions about the role of the plus lens test in school screening batteries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refração Ocular / Acuidade Visual / Seleção Visual / Óptica e Fotônica / Hiperopia / Lentes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Refração Ocular / Acuidade Visual / Seleção Visual / Óptica e Fotônica / Hiperopia / Lentes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article