Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of 24-hour specialist coverage and an on-site CT scanner on the timely diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.
Ibrahim, Irwani; Chua, Mui Teng; Tan, Desmond Wei; Yap, Si Hui; Shen, Liang; Ooi, Shirley Beng Suat.
Afiliação
  • Ibrahim I; Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Chua MT; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Tan DW; Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Yap SH; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Shen L; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ooi SBS; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore Med J ; 61(2): 86-91, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31044257
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a rare and potentially fatal condition that has been known to be missed in diagnoses. Our primary objective was to determine if the availability of 24-hour emergency department (ED) specialist coverage and an on-site computed tomography (CT) scanner reduced the rate of missed diagnoses of AAD.

METHODS:

We selected records of patients diagnosed with dissection of the aorta from a hospital's discharge database and death register in the period of January 1998 to December 2014. AAD was defined as missed if imaging to diagnose AAD or a cardiology/cardiothoracic surgical consultation was not obtained in the ED. We compared the rates of missed diagnosis before and after the availability of 24-hour ED specialist coverage and an on-site CT scanner in the ED.

RESULTS:

Among 145 patients, 42 (29.0%) had a missed diagnosis. The proportion of missed AAD was lower in the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (20.0% vs. 37.3%, odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20‒0.89; p = 0.023). After adjusting for confounders, the difference remained significant (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14‒0.70; p = 0.005). In the post-implementation period, concurrent signs of congestive cardiac failure (OR 33.51, 95% CI 1.42‒789.20; p = 0.024) and absence of a widened mediastinum on chest radiography (OR 11.52, 95% CI 1.37‒96.80; p = 0.029) were independent predictors of missed diagnoses.

CONCLUSION:

The availability of 24-hour ED specialist coverage and an on-site CT scanner improved the diagnosis of AAD in our study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma Aórtico / Erros de Diagnóstico / Cardiologistas / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aneurisma Aórtico / Erros de Diagnóstico / Cardiologistas / Dissecção Aórtica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article