Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Right on track? Performance of satellite telemetry in terrestrial wildlife research.
Hofman, M P G; Hayward, M W; Heim, M; Marchand, P; Rolandsen, C M; Mattisson, J; Urbano, F; Heurich, M; Mysterud, A; Melzheimer, J; Morellet, N; Voigt, U; Allen, B L; Gehr, B; Rouco, C; Ullmann, W; Holand, Ø; Jørgensen, N H; Steinheim, G; Cagnacci, F; Kroeschel, M; Kaczensky, P; Buuveibaatar, B; Payne, J C; Palmegiani, I; Jerina, K; Kjellander, P; Johansson, Ö; LaPoint, S; Bayrakcismith, R; Linnell, J D C; Zaccaroni, M; Jorge, M L S; Oshima, J E F; Songhurst, A; Fischer, C; Mc Bride, R T; Thompson, J J; Streif, S; Sandfort, R; Bonenfant, C; Drouilly, M; Klapproth, M; Zinner, D; Yarnell, R; Stronza, A; Wilmott, L; Meisingset, E; Thaker, M; Vanak, A T.
Afiliação
  • Hofman MPG; Wildlife Sciences, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Hayward MW; School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
  • Heim M; School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
  • Marchand P; Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
  • Rolandsen CM; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Mattisson J; Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction de la Recherche et de l'Expertise, Unité Ongulés Sauvages, Juvignac, France.
  • Urbano F; LECA, CNRS, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
  • Heurich M; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Mysterud A; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Melzheimer J; Freelance consultant, Milan, Italy.
  • Morellet N; Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Voigt U; Department of Conservation and Research, Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.
  • Allen BL; Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Gehr B; Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
  • Rouco C; CEFS, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
  • Ullmann W; Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
  • Holand Ø; University of Southern Queensland, Institute for Agriculture and the Environment, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Jørgensen NH; Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Steinheim G; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5175, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Montpellier, France.
  • Cagnacci F; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Landcare Research, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Kroeschel M; Department of Zoology, Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
  • Kaczensky P; University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
  • Buuveibaatar B; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
  • Payne JC; Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
  • Palmegiani I; Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
  • Jerina K; Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
  • Kjellander P; Department of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
  • Johansson Ö; Wildlife Ecology and Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • LaPoint S; Forest Research Institute of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Bayrakcismith R; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Linnell JDC; Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zaccaroni M; Wildlife Conservation Society, Mongolia Program, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
  • Jorge MLS; Wildlife Conservation Society, Mongolia Program, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
  • Oshima JEF; Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
  • Songhurst A; University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department for Forestry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Fischer C; Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
  • Mc Bride RT; Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
  • Thompson JJ; Snow Leopard Trust, Seattle, United States of America.
  • Streif S; Department of Migration and Immuno-ecology, Max-Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany.
  • Sandfort R; Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, United States of America.
  • Bonenfant C; Panthera, New York, NY, United States of America.
  • Drouilly M; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Klapproth M; Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Zinner D; Vanderbilt University, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
  • Yarnell R; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Laboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, Brasil.
  • Stronza A; Ecoexist, Maun, Botswana.
  • Wilmott L; University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Meisingset E; Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
  • Thaker M; Haute ecole du paysage, d'ingenierie et d'architecture de Geneve, Genève, Switzerland.
  • Vanak AT; Faro Maro Ecoresearch, Departamento de Boquerón, Paraguay.
PLoS One ; 14(5): e0216223, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31071155
ABSTRACT
Satellite telemetry is an increasingly utilized technology in wildlife research, and current devices can track individual animal movements at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions. However, as we enter the golden age of satellite telemetry, we need an in-depth understanding of the main technological, species-specific and environmental factors that determine the success and failure of satellite tracking devices across species and habitats. Here, we assess the relative influence of such factors on the ability of satellite telemetry units to provide the expected amount and quality of data by analyzing data from over 3,000 devices deployed on 62 terrestrial species in 167 projects worldwide. We evaluate the success rate in obtaining GPS fixes as well as in transferring these fixes to the user and we evaluate failure rates. Average fix success and data transfer rates were high and were generally better predicted by species and unit characteristics, while environmental characteristics influenced the variability of performance. However, 48% of the unit deployments ended prematurely, half of them due to technical failure. Nonetheless, this study shows that the performance of satellite telemetry applications has shown improvements over time, and based on our findings, we provide further recommendations for both users and manufacturers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemetria / Monitoramento Ambiental / Ecossistema / Astronave / Sistemas de Informação Geográfica / Animais Selvagens Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Telemetria / Monitoramento Ambiental / Ecossistema / Astronave / Sistemas de Informação Geográfica / Animais Selvagens Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article