Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of a Patient Education Class to Enhance Knowledge about Lung Cancer Screening: a Quality Improvement Evaluation.
Sakoda, Lori C; Meyer, Melanie A; Chawla, Neetu; Sanchez, Michael A; Blatchins, Maruta A; Nayak, Sundeep; San, Karen; Zin, Gary K; Minowada, George.
Afiliação
  • Sakoda LC; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. lori.sakoda@kp.org.
  • Meyer MA; Quality and Operations Support, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Chawla N; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
  • Sanchez MA; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA, USA.
  • Blatchins MA; Regional Health Education, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Nayak S; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
  • San K; Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Leandro, CA, USA.
  • Zin GK; Quality and Operations Support, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Minowada G; Quality and Operations Support, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Cancer Educ ; 35(5): 897-904, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31073869
Best practices to facilitate high-quality shared decision-making for lung cancer screening (LCS) are not well established. In our LCS program, patients are first referred to attend a free group education class on LCS, taught by designated clinician specialists, before a personal shared decision-making visit is scheduled. We conducted an evaluation on  the effectiveness of this class to enhance patient knowledge and shared decision-making about LCS. For quality improvement purposes, participants were asked to complete one-page surveys immediately before and after class to assess knowledge and decision-making capacity regarding LCS. To evaluate knowledge gained, we tabulated the distributions of correct, incorrect, unsure, and missing responses to eight true-false statements included on both pre- and post-class surveys and assessed pre-post differences in the number of correct responses. To evaluate decision-making capacity, we tabulated the distributions of post-class responses to items on decision uncertainty. From June 2017 to August 2018, 680 participants completed both pre- and post-class surveys. Participants had generally poor baseline knowledge about LCS. The proportion who responded correctly to each knowledge-related statement increased pre- to post-class, with a mean difference of 0.9 (paired t test, p < 0.0001) in the total number of correct responses between surveys. About 70% reported having all the information needed to make a screening decision. Our results suggest that a well-designed group education class is an effective system-level approach for initially educating and equipping patients with appropriate knowledge to make informed decisions about LCS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Tomada de Decisões / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Tomada de Decisões / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article