Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Significance of radiographic splenic vessel involvement in the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the gland.
Hyun, Jong Jin; Rose, J Bart; Alseidi, Adnan A; Biehl, Thomas R; Helton, Scott; Coy, David L; Kozarek, Richard A; Rocha, Flavio G.
Afiliação
  • Hyun JJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Rose JB; Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Alseidi AA; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Biehl TR; Section of General, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Helton S; Section of General, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Coy DL; Section of General, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kozarek RA; Section of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Rocha FG; Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(2): 262-269, 2019 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31093997
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Unlike pancreatic head tumors, little is known about the biological significance of radiographic vessel involvement with pancreatic body/tail adenocarcinoma. We hypothesized radiographic splenic vessel involvement may be an adverse prognostic factor.

METHODS:

All distal pancreatectomies performed for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 were reviewed and clinicopatholgic data were collected, retrospectively. Preoperative computed tomography imaging was re-reviewed and splenic vessel involvement was graded as none, abutment, encasement, or occlusion.

RESULTS:

Among a total of 71 patients, splenic artery or vein encasement/occlusion was present in 41% (29 of 71) of patients, each. There were no significant differences in tumor size or grade, margin positivity, and perineural or lymphovascular invasion. However, splenic artery encasement/occlusion (P = 0.001) and splenic vein encasement/occlusion (P = 0.038) both correlated with lymph node positivity. Splenic artery encasement was associated with a reduced median overall survival (20 vs 30 months, P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis also showed that splenic artery encasement was an independent risk factor of worse survival (hazard ratio, 2.246; 95% confidence interval, 1.118-4.513; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with cancer of the body or tail of the pancreas presenting with radiographic encasement of the splenic artery, but not the splenic vein, have a poorer prognosis and perhaps should be considered for neoadjuvant therapy before an attempt at curative resection.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Baço / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Baço / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article