Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Collecting Validity Evidence: A Hands-on Workshop for Medical Education Assessment Instruments.
Paul, Caroline R; Ryan, Michael S; Dallaghan, Gary L Beck; Jirasevijinda, Thanakorn; Quigley, Patricia D; Hanson, Janice L; Khidir, Amal M; Petershack, Jean; Jackson, Joseph; Tewksbury, Linda; Rocha, Mary Esther M.
Afiliação
  • Paul CR; Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
  • Ryan MS; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine.
  • Dallaghan GLB; Research Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine.
  • Jirasevijinda T; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine.
  • Quigley PD; Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
  • Hanson JL; Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
  • Khidir AM; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar.
  • Petershack J; Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
  • Jackson J; Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital.
  • Tewksbury L; Professor, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine.
  • Rocha MEM; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine.
MedEdPORTAL ; 15: 10817, 2019 04 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31139736
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

There is an increasing call for developing validity evidence in medical education assessment. The literature lacks a practical resource regarding an actual development process. Our workshop teaches how to apply principles of validity evidence to existing assessment instruments and how to develop new instruments that will yield valid data.

Methods:

The literature, consensus findings of curricula and content experts, and principles of adult learning guided the content and methodology of the workshop. The workshop underwent stringent peer review prior to presentation at one international and three national academic conferences. In the interactive workshop, selected domains of validity evidence were taught with sequential cycles of didactics, demonstration, and deliberate practice with facilitated feedback. An exercise guide steered participants through a stepwise approach. Using Likert-scale items and open-response questions, an evaluation form rated the workshop's effectiveness, captured details of how learners reached the objectives, and determined participants' plans for future work.

Results:

The workshop demonstrated generalizability with successful implementation in diverse settings. Sixty-five learners, the majority being clinician-educators, completed evaluations. Learners rated the workshop favorably for each prompt. Qualitative comments corroborated the workshop's effectiveness. The active application and facilitated feedback components allowed learners to reflect in real time as to how they were meeting a particular objective.

Discussion:

This feasible and practical educational intervention fills a literature gap by showing the medical educator how to apply validity evidence to both existing and in-development assessment instruments. Thus, it holds the potential to significantly impact learner and, subsequently, patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coleta de Dados / Inquéritos e Questionários / Avaliação Educacional / Retroalimentação Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coleta de Dados / Inquéritos e Questionários / Avaliação Educacional / Retroalimentação Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article