Chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repairs compared with laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair: an international questionnaire study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The best repair of a recurrent inguinal hernia after primary laparoendoscopic repair is debatable. The aim was to assess chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic repairs in the same groin compared with Lichtenstein reoperation preceded by a laparoendoscopic repair. METHODS: This cohort study included adult patients who had received two laparoendoscopic repairs (Lap-Lap) or a laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair (Lap-Lich). Eligible patients were identified in the Danish and the Swedish hernia databases. Lap-Lap was matched 13 with Lap-Lich, and patients were sent validated questionnaires. The primary outcome was the proportion with chronic pain-related functional impairment, compared between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included chronic pain during various activities. RESULTS: In total, 74% (546 patients) responded to the questionnaires with a median follow-up since the second repair of 4.9 years (0.9-21.9 years). Regarding the primary outcome, 21% in Lap-Lap and Lap-Lich had chronic pain-related functional impairment of daily activities (p = 0.94). More patients in Lap-Lap compared with Lap-Lich reported pain ≥ 20 mm measured by the visual analog scale, 11% versus 5%, p = 0.04. However, there was no difference in the median VAS score or in the vast majority of the remaining secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall difference in chronic pain between patients who had received Lap-Lap compared with Lap-Lich. Choice of operative strategy for the second repair should, therefore, not be based on risk of chronic pain.