Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Liquid mycobacterial culture outcomes after different sputum collection techniques before and during treatment.
Lourens, Madeleine; Philips, Lauren; Kleinhans, Carmen C; Friedrich, Sven O; Martinson, Neil; Venter, Amour; van der Merwe, Lize; Diacon, Andreas H.
Afiliação
  • Lourens M; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
  • Philips L; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
  • Kleinhans CC; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
  • Friedrich SO; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa; Division of Medical Physiology, MRC Centre for Tuberculosis Research, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
  • Martinson N; Perinatal HIV Research Unit (PHRU), SA MRC Soweto Matlosana Collaborating Centre for HIV AIDS and TB, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Venter A; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
  • van der Merwe L; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa.
  • Diacon AH; TASK Applied Science, 1 Smal Street, Bellville, 7530, South Africa; Division of Medical Physiology, MRC Centre for Tuberculosis Research, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. Elec
Tuberculosis (Edinb) ; 116: 17-21, 2019 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31153513
ABSTRACT

SETTING:

Mycobacterial sputum culture is a key diagnostic and research tool.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare mycobacterial culture outcomes of three sputum collection methods.

DESIGN:

We compared culture results within sets of three sputum samples collected from 18 HIV-infected adult tuberculosis patients at regular intervals up to 84 days after treatment initiation. The first sputum was collected at home and brought to the clinic, where a second and third sputum were consecutively collected under supervision following mouthwash with bottled water and chlorhexidine solution respectively. All sputa were processed for liquid culture in duplicate.

RESULTS:

Out of 556 cultures 430 (77.3%), 91 (16.4%) and 35 (6.3%) were positive, negative or contaminated, respectively. The odds of contamination were higher with home collection and with water rinse than with chlorhexidine rinse (OR 12.5, p < 0.001 and OR 6.7, p = 0.015). Chlorhexidine rinse increased the odds of a negative culture compared to water rinse (OR 3.5, p = 0.002). The odds of a positive culture were greater with water rinse than with home collection (OR 2.5, p = 0.005). Water rinse significantly reduced time to culture positivity.

CONCLUSION:

Compared to sputum collected at home, chlorhexidine rinse reduces culture contamination and water rinse increases the rate and viable mycobacterial load of positive cultures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manejo de Espécimes / Escarro / Tuberculose Pulmonar / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Manejo de Espécimes / Escarro / Tuberculose Pulmonar / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article