[HPV E6 and E7 mRNA combined with HPV 16 and 18 or 45 genotyping testing as a means of cervical cancer opportunistic screening].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate Aptima HPV E6 and E7 mRNA assay (Aptima HPV) combined with Aptima HPV 16 and 18 or 45 (18/45) genotype assay (Aptima HPV-GT) as a means of cervical cancer opportunistic screening. Methods: From October 2016 to October 2017, a total of 23 258 women aged 25-65 years were enrolled in the physical examination center and gynecological clinic of Huzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital. All the women had Aptima HPV tested, further Aptima HPV-GT testing for positive women and liquid-based thin layer cytology Thinprep cytologic test (TCT). Women with Aptima HPV (+) or ≥low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or obvious clinical symptoms (including vaginal bleeding after intercourse and watery, bloody vaginal discharge) were referred for colposcopy and further biopsy with or without endocervical curettage (ECC) if indicated. Expression of Aptima HPV, HPV 16 and HPV 18/45 with different cytological diagnostic groups and histological diagnosis groups were compared respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Aptima HPV detection and TCT in identifying histological diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse (HSIL(+)) were compared. Results: (1) The positive rates of Aptima HPV, HPV 16 and HPV 18/45 were 14.00% (3 257/23 258), 1.85% (430/23 258) and 0.86% (199/23 258) respectively.The positive rates of Aptima HPV, HPV 16 and HPV 18/45 increased with cytology grading in squamous epithelium [negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), LSIL, atypical squamous cell cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), HSIL and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), all P=0.000)]. According to histology results, the positive rates of Aptima HPV, HPV 16 and HPV 18/45 increased with histology grading in squamous epithelium (normal cervical tissue, LSIL, HSIL and SCC, all P=0.000). The positive rate of Aptima HPV was significantly higher in HSIL(+) group than that in the LSIL or better (LSIL(-)) group [98.11% (311/317) vs 12.84% (2 946/22 941), P=0.000]. The positive rate of Aptima HPV-GT was significantly higher in HSIL(+) group than that in LSIL(-) group [58.36% (185/317) vs 1.91% (439/22 941), P=0.000]. (2) Compared with cytology, Aptima HPV resulted in significant higher sensitivity (98.11% vs 59.62%, P=0.000) and negative predictive value (99.97% vs 99.42%, P=0.000), significant lower specificity (87.16% vs 95.37%, P=0.000) and positive predictive value (9.55% vs 15.10%, P=0.000) when identified HSIL(+). Conclusions: Women with Aptima HPV positive, especially those with Aptima HPV-GT positive, are more likely to have histological diagnosis of HSIL(+). Aptima HPV combined with Aptima HPV-GT is feasible as a means of cervical cancer opportunistic screening in tertiary hospitals.