Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antifungal prophylaxis in lung transplant: A survey of United States' transplant centers.
Pennington, Kelly M; Yost, Kathleen J; Escalante, Patricio; Razonable, Raymund R; Kennedy, Cassie C.
Afiliação
  • Pennington KM; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Yost KJ; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Escalante P; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Razonable RR; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kennedy CC; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 33(7): e13630, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173402
BACKGROUND: Antifungal prophylaxis strategies for lung transplant recipients vary without consensus or standard of care. Our current study aims to identify antifungal prophylaxis practices in the United States. METHODS: From November 29, 2018, to February 15, 2019, we emailed surveys to medical directors of adult lung transplant centers. An alternate physician representative was approached if continued non-response after three survey attempts. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings. RESULTS: Forty-four of 62 (71.0%) eligible centers responded. All Organ Procurement and Transplantation Networks were represented. Only four (9.1%) centers used pre-transplant prophylaxis for prevention of tracheobronchitis (3 of 4) and invasive fungal disease (4 of 4). Thirty-nine of forty (97.5%) centers used post-transplant prophylaxis: 36 (90.0%) universal and 3 (7.5%) pre-emptive/selective prophylaxis. Most centers used nebulized amphotericin with a systemic agent (26 of 36, 72.2%). Thirty-two of thirty-six (88.9%) centers continued universal prophylaxis beyond the hospital setting. Duration of prophylaxis ranged from the post-transplant hospitalization to lifelong with most centers (25 of 36, 69.4%) discontinuing prophylaxis 6 months or less post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Most United States' lung transplant centers utilize a universal prophylaxis with nebulized amphotericin and a systemic triazole for 6 months or less post-transplant. Very few centers use pre-transplant antifungal prophylaxis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Padrões de Prática Médica / Transplante de Pulmão / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Micoses / Antifúngicos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Padrões de Prática Médica / Transplante de Pulmão / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto / Micoses / Antifúngicos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article