Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the Practice of Repositioning Endotracheal Tubes in Neonates and Children Based on Radiographic Location.
Im, Daniel D; Ross, Patrick A; Hotz, Justin; Newth, Christopher J L.
Afiliação
  • Im DD; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Ross PA; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Hotz J; Department of Pediatrics, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Newth CJL; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 20(11): 1057-1060, 2019 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31206500
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Chest radiographs are commonly performed in the ICU setting to confirm the position of the endotracheal tube. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practice and accuracy of repositioning endotracheal tubes in the pediatric population based on chest radiograph.

DESIGN:

Retrospective review of patient's medical record and chest radiograph.

SETTING:

Single-institution, academic children's hospital. PATIENTS PICU and cardiothoracic ICU patients who had repositioning of their endotracheal tube from September 1, 2016, to September 1, 2017. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Chest radiograph before and after endotracheal tube repositioning were examined measuring the distance from the endotracheal tube tip to carina. A total of 183 endotracheal tube repositionings were assessed. Twenty-nine percent of endotracheal tube repositionings resulted in a persistently malpositioned endotracheal tube, requiring another intervention. For intended endotracheal tube repositioning of ± 2.0 cm, the actual change measured compared to intended adjustment was a median of 0.7 cm (interquartile range, 0.35-1.1 cm). For intended ± 1.5 cm, the median difference was 0.4 cm (interquartile range, 0.16-0.90 cm). For intended ± 1.0 cm, the median difference was 0.5 cm (interquartile range, 0.20-0.90 cm). For intended ± 0.5 cm, the median difference was 0.3 cm (interquartile range, 0.2-0.88 cm). When the head was malpositioned the difference from intended endotracheal tube repositioning to actual was median 0.70 cm (interquartile range, 0.40-1.1 cm), this was significantly higher than when the head was in a good position

CONCLUSIONS:

When repositioning endotracheal tubes based on chest radiograph, there is a significant difference between intended and actual adjustment with great variability. Avoiding very small repositionings (± 0.5 cm) and standardizing head position prior to daily chest radiograph may reduce these errors.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intubação Intratraqueal Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intubação Intratraqueal Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article