Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal lesions in a specialist regional early rectal cancer centre: the Mersey experience.
Ondhia, M; Tamvakeras, P; O'Toole, P; Montazerri, A; Andrews, T; Farrell, C; Ahmed, S; Slawik, S; Ahmed, S.
Afiliação
  • Ondhia M; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Tamvakeras P; Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • O'Toole P; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Montazerri A; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.
  • Andrews T; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Farrell C; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Ahmed S; Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Slawik S; Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Ahmed S; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(10): 1164-1174, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31207005
AIM: Organ-preserving local excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for early rectal cancer offers significantly lower morbidity as compared to formal rectal cancer resection with acceptable outcomes. This study presents our 6-year experience of TEM for rectal lesions referred to a specialist early rectal cancer centre in the UK. METHOD: Data were collected for all patients referred for TEM of suspected early rectal cancer to a regional specialist early rectal cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) over a 6-year period. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients who underwent full-thickness TEM for suspected or confirmed early rectal cancer were included. Thirty patients were referred for TEM following incomplete endoscopic polypectomy. Final pathology was benign in 77 (54.6%) cases and malignant in 64 (45.4%). Of the 61 confirmed adenocarcinomas, TEM resections were pT0 in 17 (27.9%), pT1 in 32 (51.7%), pT2 in 11 (18.0%) and pT3 in 1 (1.6%). Thirty-eight of 61 patients (62.3%) had one or more poor histological prognostic features and these patients were offered further treatment. Twenty-three of 61 (37.7%) patients with rectal adenocarcinoma required no further treatment following TEM. Forty-three cases of rectal adenocarcinoma were available for establishing recurrence rates. Two of 43 patients (4.7%) developed a recurrence at a median follow-up of 28.7 months (12.1-66.5 months). The overall estimated 5-year overall survival rate was 87.9% and the disease-free survival rate was 82.9%. CONCLUSION: Acceptable outcomes are possible for TEM surgery with appropriate patient selection, effective technique, expert histopathology, appropriate referral for adjuvant treatment and meticulous follow-up. This can be achieved through an early rectal cancer MDT in a dedicated specialist regional centre.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal / Protectomia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal / Protectomia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article