Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems.
BMC Oral Health
; 19(1): 124, 2019 06 21.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31226984
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The aim of this study is to compare the torsional resistance of the available ProTaper rotary systems, namely, ProTaper Universal (PTU), ProTaper Next (PTN), and ProTaper Gold (PTG).METHODS:
A total of 195 files from the three systems distributed into 13 groups (PTU-S1, PTU-S2, PTU-F1, PTU-F2, PTU-F3, PTG-S1, PTG-S2, PTG-F1, PTG-F2, PTG-F3, PTN-X1, PTN-X2 and PTN-X3) were subjected to torsional fatigue until failure. The torsional test was performed according to ISO 3630-1, where each file was placed in a straight position to eliminate the influence of cyclic fatigue. The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to compare the mean maximum torques and angular deflections at fracture for the groups, and the Mann-Whitney test was performed for pairwise comparisons. The significance level was set at 0.05 and the fractured surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope.RESULT:
Among the tested files, PTG-S1 had the lowest torsional fatigue resistance, whereas PTU-F2 and PTU-F3 had the highest torsional resistance. The scanning electron microscope showed typical features of torsional failure.CONCLUSION:
The new ProTaper systems (PTG and PTN) did not show improved torsional resistance in comparison with PTU.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Teste de Materiais
/
Preparo de Canal Radicular
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article